Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 4 of 4 (0.21 seconds)
Union Of India Through Its Under ... vs Sarthak Singh & Anr. on 21 October, 2024 cites

Indrapal Yadav vs Union Of India Through on 13 January, 2015

6. Though, in the synopsis filed with the writ petition, a somewhat surprising stand has been adopted by the petitioner that the judgment in Divyanshu Patel is to be treated as having been rendered in personam, such a stand, thankfully, has not been raised before this Court by Mr. Kurup, learned counsel for the petitioner, obviously owing to his experience at the Bar. Suffice it to state, however, in order to avoid any such submission in other cases, that it is not open to any executive authority to suo motu treat a judgment of a Court as having been rendered in personam unless the judgment itself say so. Rather the Supreme Court has in State of UP v Arvind Kumar Srivastava8, Inderpal Yadav v UOI9, repeatedly held that the executive should ensure that the benefit of judgments which are rendered by the Court is extended to other persons similarly situated without requiring every such person to approach the Court.
Central Administrative Tribunal - Delhi Cites 10 - Cited by 29 - Full Document

Sarthak Singh @ Babu Singh vs Union Of India Through Ncb. ...Opposite ... on 22 November, 2021

1. Respondent 1 was the applicant before the learned Central Administrative Tribunal1 in OA 2554/20232. He applied for appearing in the Central Civil Services (Preliminary) Examination 20223, for which he declared himself to be a candidate belonging to the Other Backward Classes4 belonging to the Non-Creamy Layer5. He also attached with the application form, a certificate certifying that he was 1 "the Tribunal", hereinafter 2 "Sarthak Singh v UOI & Ors"
Jharkhand High Court Cites 0 - Cited by 0 - R Mukhopadhyay - Full Document
1