Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 14 (0.20 seconds)
Smt P Shanthi vs Govindaraju on 27 June, 2023 cites

Guntaiah & Ors vs Hambamma & Ors on 22 July, 2005

7. The respondent No.2-Assistant Commissioner only on the ground that alienation is made after commencement of PTCL Act has ordered for restoration of -7- NC: 2023:KHC:22255 WP No. 24392 of 2013 the land. The respondent No.3-Deputy Commissioner placing reliance on the judgment rendered by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Guntaiah and Others vs. Hambamma and Others2 and referring to the material on record has come to conclusion that land in question was granted on temporary lease during 1941-42 and subsequently, it was confirmed during 1960-61 under Rule 43-J and a condition was imposed under Rule 43-G thereby imposing a restriction on alienation for a period of 20 years. It is in this background, respondent No.3- Deputy Commissioner has come to conclusion that the petition land was granted in favour of scheduled caste person and therefore, alienation is hit by Section 4(2) of PTCL Act and consequently, appeal is dismissed.
Supreme Court of India Cites 5 - Cited by 45 - K G Balakrishnan - Full Document
1   2 Next