Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 25 (0.27 seconds)

State Of Gujarat vs Najruddin Vali Mamad Momin Gadhvala & 6 on 23 March, 2015

13. Arguments have been heard from the Ld. Addl. PP as also from the Ld.Counsel for accused. Ld. Addl.PP has argued that the recovery witnesses examined by the prosecution have proved the FIR No. 194/2013 State Vs. Najruddin etc. Page No.10 of 44 recovery   of   324   Kgs   of   ganja   from   the   possession   of   accused persons. All the relevant provisions of NDPS Act have been duly complied with. The witnesses have supported the prosecution case. FSL result confirms that the recovered substance was ganja. It is therefore, argued that the prosecution has been able to prove its case against the accused.
Gujarat High Court Cites 6 - Cited by 1 - Full Document

Ajmer Singh vs State Of Haryana on 15 February, 2010

However, in the case of Ajmer Singh Vs. State of Haryana 2010 (2) SCR 785, the Hon'ble Supreme Court upheld the order of Delhi High Court on the issue of ignoring the delay being of 15 days and holding that the statements of witnesses and the report of FSL show sample was received in a sealed cover and there was no tampering of the sample.
Supreme Court of India Cites 13 - Cited by 657 - H L Dattu - Full Document
1   2 3 Next