Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 11 (0.37 seconds)State Of U.P., Through The Principal ... vs Dushyant Sharma & Anr. on 13 January, 2010
50000/ for the purchase of a Tractor and on her refusal their behavior changed
State Vs. Dushyant Kumar & others (FIR No:478/2004)
The Indian Penal Code, 1860
Section 498A in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 34 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 161 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Raj Kumar Khanna vs The State (Nct Of Delhi) And Ors. on 15 October, 2001
Further in Raj Kumar Khanna v. State
(NCT of Delhi) & Ors. 95(2002) DLT 147 (DB) it was observed that to attract Section
406 IPC there must be specific allegation of entrustment.
Shanti Devi vs State Of Haryana And Ors. on 7 April, 1999
In Shanti Devi v. State of Haryana I(2000) DMC 697 it was observed that it was not
clear from the complaint which was the basis for prosecution as to when the accused
persons demanded articles or money or misappropriated the articles given to the bride or
the bridegroom at the time of marriage.
Onkar Nath Mishra & Ors vs State (Nct Of Delhi) & Anr on 14 December, 2007
In the recent
judgment Onkar Nath Mishra & Ors. vs. State (NCT of Delhi) & Anrs. 2008 (1) JCC
65 the Hon'ble Supreme Court observed
"It is true that at the stage of framing of charge the court is required to
evaluate the material and documents on record with a view to finding out if the facts
emerging therefrom, taken at their face value, disclosed the existence of all the
ingredients constituting the alleged offence. At this stage, the court is not expected to
go deep into the probative value of the material on record. What needs to be
considered is whether there is a ground for presuming that the offence has been
committed and not a ground for convicting the accused has been made out. At that
stage, even strong suspicion founded on material which leads the court to form a
presumptive opinion as to the existence of the factual ingredients constituting the
offence alleged would justify the framing of charge against the accused in respect of
the commission of that offence".