Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 27 (0.27 seconds)
Muhammad Umar Iqbal vs The State Of Bihar on 1 October, 2020 cites

Om Prakash Shukla vs Akhilesh Kumar Shukla & Ors on 18 March, 1986

In the case of Om Prakash Shukla v. Akhilesh Kumar Shukla [1986 Supp SCC 285 : 1986 SCC (L&S) 644 : AIR 1986 SC 1043] it has been clearly laid down by a Bench of three learned Judges of this Court that when the petitioner appeared at the examination without protest and when he found that he would not succeed in examination he filed a petition challenging the said examination, the High Court should not have granted any relief to such a petitioner."
Supreme Court of India Cites 3 - Cited by 652 - E S Venkataramiah - Full Document

Prakash Chandra Verma And Anr vs Smt. Kesari Bai And Ors 36 Mac/1315/2014 ... on 23 February, 2018

In Chandra Prakash Tiwari v. Shakuntala Shukla [Chandra Prakash Tiwari v. Shakuntala Shukla, (2002) 6 SCC 127 : 2002 SCC (L&S) 830] , this Court laid down the principle that when a candidate appears at an examination without objection and is subsequently found to be not successful, a challenge to the process is precluded. The question of entertaining a petition challenging an examination would not arise where a candidate has appeared and participated. He or she cannot subsequently turn around and contend that the process was unfair or that there was a lacuna therein, merely because the result is not palatable.
Chattisgarh High Court Cites 0 - Cited by 19 - Full Document

Amlan Jyoti Borooah vs State Of Assam & Ors on 23 January, 2009

14. The same view was reiterated in Amlan Jyoti Borooah [Amlan Jyoti Borooah v. State of Assam, (2009) 3 SCC 227 : (2009) 1 SCC (L&S) 627] wherein it was held to be well settled that the candidates who have taken part in a selection process knowing fully well the procedure laid down therein are not entitled to question it upon being declared to be unsuccessful.
Supreme Court of India Cites 12 - Cited by 212 - S B Sinha - Full Document
1   2 3 Next