Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 12 (0.36 seconds)Telangana Fire Service Act, 1999
Article 21A in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Avinash Mehrotra vs Union Of India & Ors on 13 April, 2009
44. We also do not find any merit in the plea taken by the
petitioners that the safety norms engrafted in the NBC, 2016
would not be applicable to schools that were in existence prior to
the ruling of the Supreme Court in the case of Avinash Mehrotra
(supra). The petitioners were all along aware of the mandatory
requirement of obtaining a fire NOC and had on their own given
an undertaking to furnish one to the authorities. When the
petitioners had voluntarily given an undertaking to the
respondent No.2/TSBIE that if they do not obtain a fire NOC in
respect of the building from where the junior college was
operating, they would shift the students to a fire compliant
building, they must be firmly held to the said undertaking. They
cannot be permitted to renege by offering frivolous excuses to
wriggle out of the stipulations of law. In any event, the
petitioners were duly accommodated by the respondent
No.2/TSBIE. While rejecting their application for affiliation and
ordering closure of the colleges, respondent No.2/TSBIE had
directed the petitioners to shift the students to another suitable
building for the next academic year so as not to jeopardise the
career of the students studying in the said colleges.
The Andhra Pradesh Fire Service Act, 1999
Article 21 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Section 13 in Sikkim Fire Services Act, 1981 [Entire Act]
Section 101 in The Andhra Pradesh Reorganisation Act, 2014 [Entire Act]
Ashoka Kumar Thakur vs Union Of India & Ors on 10 April, 2008
We reached a similar conclusion,
on the comprehensive guarantees implicit in the
right to education, only recently in our opinion
in Ashoka Kumar Thakur v. Union of
India [(2008) 6 SCC 1]