Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 6 of 6 (0.03 seconds)The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908
Rajinder Singh Etc. vs Kultar Singh And Ors. on 16 July, 1979
In Rajinder
Singh v Kultar Singh (1979 SCC OnLine P&H 145), it was held that the
punctuation (semi-colon) cannot be discarded as being inappropriate and that
it had been put with a definite object of making the preceding and the
succeeding topics distinct.
Saurav Jain vs M/S A.B.P. Design on 5 August, 2021
In Saurav Jain v. A.B.P.Design (2022) 18 SCC
633, the amended Order 41 Rule 22 of CPC was considered. The Hon'ble
Supreme Court held that on account of the presence of semi-colon, the two
parts of the sentence must be read disjunctively.
Junglee Games India Private Limited vs The State Of Tamil Nadu on 25 February, 2021
The Madras High Court in
Junglee Games India Private Limited v. State of T.N (2021 SCC OnLine
Mad 2762), observed that where the punctuation semi-colon is used between
two sets of matters, they may be allied or related fields but distinct
nonetheless.
The State Of Tamil Nadu vs M/S. Everest Industries Limited on 29 August, 2023
The Hon'ble Division Bench in State of T.N. vs. Everest
Industries Ltd., (2022 SCC OnLine Mad 8919) also held that the use of the
semi-colon in the sub-clauses followed by the disjunctive “or” indicated that the
legislature intended to treat the sub-clauses as distinct and capable of being
treated independently.
1