Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 19 (0.38 seconds)
Ponnayal vs The State Of Tamil Nadu cites

Delhi Administration vs Gurdip Singh Uban And Ors. Etc on 18 August, 2000

15. Section 5-A of the Act is in two parts. Upon receipt of objections, the Collector is required to make such further enquiry as he may think necessary whereupon he must submit a report to the appropriate Government in respect of the land which is the subject matter of Notification under Section 4 of the Act. The said Report would also contain recommendations on the objections filed by the owner of the land. He is required to forward the records of the proceedings held by him together with the report. On receipt of such a Report together with the records of the case, the Government is to render a decision thereupon. It is now well-settled in view of a catena of decisions that the declaration made under Section 6 of the Act need not contain any reason.[See Kalumiya Karimmiya v. The State of Gujarat and Ors., :[1977]2SCR606 and Delhi Administration v. Gurdip Singh Uban and Ors.,:
Supreme Court of India Cites 24 - Cited by 388 - M J Rao - Full Document

Narain Das Jain (Since Deceased) By L.Rs vs Agra Nagar Mahapalika, Agra on 14 February, 1991

In Narain Das Jain (since deceased) by L.Rs. v. Agra Nagar Mahapalika, Agra: (1991) 4 SCC 212, this Court placed reliance upon various reports including the report of the Law Commission of India which made it clear that "community has no right to enrich itself by deliberately taking away the property of any of its members in such circumstances without providing adequate compensation for it".
Supreme Court of India Cites 16 - Cited by 30 - M M Punchhi - Full Document

Bhusawal Municipal Council vs Nivrutti Ramchandra Phalak & Ors on 17 December, 2013

16. However, considerations of the objections by the owner of the land and the acceptance of the recommendations by the Government, it is trite must precede a proper application of mind on the part of the Government.As and when a person aggrieved questions the decision-making process, the court in order to satisfy itself as to whether one or more grounds for judicial review exists, may call for the records whereupon such records must be produced. The writ petition was filed in the year 1989. As noticed hereinbefore, the said writ petition was allowed. This Court however, interfered with the said order of the High Court and remitted the matter back to it upon giving an opportunity to the parties to raise additional pleadings.” (15)In the judgement in Busawal Municipal Council Case, referred supra, the Hon’ble Supreme Court after referring to all the earlier judgements held that right to property is not only a constitutional right under Article 300-A of the Constitution of India, 1950 but is also a statutory right and sometimes it may even be a human right since at times a person may lose his livelihood by losing his property. The relevant portions in the judgement is extracted hereunder:
Supreme Court of India Cites 11 - Cited by 43 - B S Chauhan - Full Document
1   2 Next