Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 10 (0.25 seconds)
Elayaraja vs The State Represented By on 20 January, 2023 cites

Shri Milan Anandan & Ors. vs State Of U.P. Thur. Its Principal Secy. ... on 14 July, 2017

8.In recent times, the offences under POCSO Act are committed by the teenagers in the raising trend, not being aware of the consequences. Considering such cases, compromise of victim and accused, on the ground that they have got legally married, has been accepted and thereby, the cases 6/9 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P..No.28937 of 2022 have been quashed against them in the following cases: (1) Ashok Dhondiba Kale Vs. State of Maharashtra through Investigation Officer and Others reported in 2018 SCC Online Bom 1826; (2) Nivas Balu Vs. State of Maharashtra and Another reported in 2018 SCC Online Bom 12997; (3) Ajith Vs. The State and Ors reported in MANU/TN/4955/2022; (4) Anandan and Ors. Vs. State and Ors reported in MANU/TN/6968/2022.
Allahabad High Court Cites 32 - Cited by 1 - Full Document

The State Of Madhya Pradesh vs Dhruv Gurjar on 22 February, 2019

9. The main issue that requires the consideration of this Court is as to whether this Court can quash the criminal proceedings involving non-compoundable offences pending against the petitioners. The Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Parbathbhai Aahir @ Parbathbhai Vs. State of Gujrath, reported in 2017 9 SCC 641 and in case of The State of Madhya Pradesh Vs. Dhruv Gurjar and Another reported in (2019) 2 MLJ Crl 10, has given sufficient guidelines that must be taken into consideration by this Court while exercising its jurisdiction under Section 482 of Cr.P.C, to quash non-compoundable offences. One very important test that has been laid down is that the Court must necessarily examine if the crime in question is purely individual in nature or a crime against the society with overriding public interest. The Hon'ble Supreme Court has held that offences against the society with overriding public interest even if it gets settled between the parties, cannot be quashed by this Court.
Supreme Court of India Cites 26 - Cited by 1397 - M R Shah - Full Document

Ramchandra Dhondiba Kaware vs State Of Maharashtra on 27 January, 2009

8.In recent times, the offences under POCSO Act are committed by the teenagers in the raising trend, not being aware of the consequences. Considering such cases, compromise of victim and accused, on the ground that they have got legally married, has been accepted and thereby, the cases 6/9 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P..No.28937 of 2022 have been quashed against them in the following cases: (1) Ashok Dhondiba Kale Vs. State of Maharashtra through Investigation Officer and Others reported in 2018 SCC Online Bom 1826; (2) Nivas Balu Vs. State of Maharashtra and Another reported in 2018 SCC Online Bom 12997; (3) Ajith Vs. The State and Ors reported in MANU/TN/4955/2022; (4) Anandan and Ors. Vs. State and Ors reported in MANU/TN/6968/2022.
Supreme Court of India Cites 3 - Cited by 7 - A Pasayat - Full Document

Nivas Balu More vs The State Of Maharashtra And Anr on 1 October, 2018

8.In recent times, the offences under POCSO Act are committed by the teenagers in the raising trend, not being aware of the consequences. Considering such cases, compromise of victim and accused, on the ground that they have got legally married, has been accepted and thereby, the cases 6/9 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P..No.28937 of 2022 have been quashed against them in the following cases: (1) Ashok Dhondiba Kale Vs. State of Maharashtra through Investigation Officer and Others reported in 2018 SCC Online Bom 1826; (2) Nivas Balu Vs. State of Maharashtra and Another reported in 2018 SCC Online Bom 12997; (3) Ajith Vs. The State and Ors reported in MANU/TN/4955/2022; (4) Anandan and Ors. Vs. State and Ors reported in MANU/TN/6968/2022.
Bombay High Court Cites 0 - Cited by 1 - B Dangre - Full Document

Ajith Kumar, A And Ors. Etc. vs The State Of Karnataka And Ors. Etc. on 20 October, 2016

8.In recent times, the offences under POCSO Act are committed by the teenagers in the raising trend, not being aware of the consequences. Considering such cases, compromise of victim and accused, on the ground that they have got legally married, has been accepted and thereby, the cases 6/9 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P..No.28937 of 2022 have been quashed against them in the following cases: (1) Ashok Dhondiba Kale Vs. State of Maharashtra through Investigation Officer and Others reported in 2018 SCC Online Bom 1826; (2) Nivas Balu Vs. State of Maharashtra and Another reported in 2018 SCC Online Bom 12997; (3) Ajith Vs. The State and Ors reported in MANU/TN/4955/2022; (4) Anandan and Ors. Vs. State and Ors reported in MANU/TN/6968/2022.
Supreme Court - Daily Orders Cites 0 - Cited by 2 - Full Document
1