Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 16 (0.70 seconds)
Sh. Rajinder Singh vs Union Of India on 11 January, 2016 cites

Rajinder Singh Rana vs Uoi & Anr. on 8 September, 2010

9. Respondent no.1/ Union of India filed written statement and taken Preliminary Objections that the Land Reforms Act is not applicable in the land in dispute. The LAC No. 110/11 Rajinder Singh vs. UOI & Anr. 4/10 petitioner is not a recorded owner, therefore, not entitled to claim compensation or enhancement. It is stated that the land is not surrounded by any developed or underdeveloped colony and can only be used for agriculture purposes. On merits, all the averments are denied. It is stated that the compensation has been legally and correctly assessed by LAC and the same is adequate and just. The conclusion arrived at by LAC is based upon cogent reasons and evidence, therefore, petitioner is not entitled for enhancement of compensation as alleged. It is stated that the petitioner is also not entitled for compensation of any loss of earnings.
Delhi High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 2 - M C Garg - Full Document

Union Of India Thru General Manager , New ... vs Anirudh Kumar Singh on 29 July, 2010

3. According to statement of Section 19 of the Act filed by the Collector, separate reference was made to the court, which was decided in case LAC No. 93/09/06 titled as Union of India vs. Anirudh Sharma and others and was numbered as IP No. 6 as per judgment dated 17.07.2009. As per judgment dated 17.07.2009, the matter was compromised and settled in that court as well as before Mediation Cell, so the compromise was accepted and an amount of Rs.320972.29 was decided for the IP No. 6.
Allahabad High Court Cites 0 - Cited by 7 - D P Singh - Full Document
1   2 Next