Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 12 (1.13 seconds)Section 313 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Section 279 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 338 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Abdul Subhan vs State (Nct Of Delhi) on 27 September, 2006
26. The Hon'ble Delhi High Court in Judgment titled "Abdul Subhan vs.
State" 2007 (1) CCC (HC) 414 observed;
State Of Karnataka vs Satish on 13 March, 1996
25. It is a settled proposition of law that mere reiteration either of term
rash and negligent or use of term 'high / fast speed' would not serve
the purpose of prosecution to establish criminal rashness or
negligence against the accused. The Hon'ble Apex Court in the
judgment titled "State of Karnataka vs. Satish" SCC (CRI) 1508
observed;
Rathnashalvan vs State Of Karnataka on 11 January, 2007
19. The Hon'ble Supreme Court in Rathnashalvan v. State of
Karnataka AIR 2007 SC 1064 while dealing with a case u/s 304A
IPC observed :