Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 6 of 6 (0.18 seconds)

Bihar Public Service Commn vs Saiyed Hussain Abbas Rizwi & Anr on 13 December, 2012

It is also seen from the FAA's order dated 11/06/2012 that Ms. Neha Bhargava had appeared before him on 14/04/2012 and vehemently objected to the disclosure of information claiming that a domestic violence case has been registered by her against the appellant and there is a threat to her life. The Hon'ble Supreme Court in its decision dated 13/12/2012 Bihar Public Service Commission vs. Sayyed Hussain Abbas Rizvi & Anr [Civil appeal No. 9052 of 2012] has, inter alia, held that clause 8(1)(g) can come into play with any kind of relationship. It requires that where the disclosure of such information which would endanger the life or physical safety of any person or identify the source of information or assistance given in confidence for law enforcement or security purpose, the information need not be provided. In other words if in the opinion of the concerned authority there is danger to life or possibility of danger to physical safety, the CPIO would be entitled to bring such case within the exemption of Section 8(1)(g) of the RTI Act.
Supreme Court of India Cites 22 - Cited by 931 - S Kumar - Full Document

Mr. Santosh Kumar Mishra vs Department Of Atomic Energy on 20 June, 2012

The FAA in his order dated 11/06/2012 has held that the information sought cannot be disclosed being exempt under Section 8(1)(e) & (j) of the RTI Act. This is in line with the Commission's decision in appeal file no. CIC/SM/A/2010/000985 (SK Mishra Vs Department of Atomic Energy) dated 16/03/2011 in which it has been held that if the wife alleges harassment and objects to the disclosure of information which is personal in nature having no relationship to any public activity, the same need not be disclosed being exempt under Section 8(1)(j) of the RTI Act.
Central Information Commission Cites 4 - Cited by 1 - Full Document
1