Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 18 (0.27 seconds)Section 139 in The Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 [Entire Act]
Section 118 in The Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 [Entire Act]
Section 251 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Section 313 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Section 98 in The Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 [Entire Act]
New India Assurance Co Ltd. vs Krishna Kumar Pandey on 6 December, 2019
In New India Assurance Co. Ltd. v. Krishna Kumar Pandey5,
Supreme Court held that the scope of the revisional jurisdiction of the High
Court is limited to the extent of satisfying itself as to the correctness, legality
or propriety of any finding, sentence or order passed by an inferior court.
The Revisional Court is entitled to look into the regularity of any
proceedings before an inferior court. As reiterated by this Court in a number
of cases, the purpose of this revisional power is to set right a patent defect or
an error of jurisdiction or law. The High Court, in revisional jurisdiction,
does not sit as a court of appeal to re-evaluate the findings of the lower
courts.
State Of Kerala, Managing Director, ... vs Puttumana Illath Jathavedan ... on 11 February, 1999
The same principles were reiterated in State of Kerala v. Puttumana
Illath Jathavedan Namboodiri6, wherein the Supreme Court underscored
the scope of revisional jurisdiction of the High Court:
Bharat Barrel And Drum Manufacturing ... vs Amin Chand Payrelal on 18 February, 1999
10) The Hon'ble Delhi High Court in Crl. A . 98/2017, Sanjay Arora
v. Monika Singh relying upon the judgments of the Hon'ble Supreme
Court in Bharat Barrel & Drum MFG. Co. v. Amin Chand Payrelal
(1999) 3 SCC 35, M.M.T.C. Ltd. v. Medchl Chemicals &·Pharma (P)
Ltd. (2002) 1 SCC 234, Hiten P. Dalal v. Bratindranath Banerjee
(2001) 6 SSC 16, Malllavarappu Kasivisweswara Rao v. Thadikonda
Ramulu Firm (2008) 7 SCC 655 and Rangappa v. Sri. Mohan (2010)
11 SCC 441, it has been held that :-
M/S M. M. T. C. Ltd. & Anr vs M/S Medchl Chemicals & Pharma P. Ltd. & ... on 19 November, 2001
10) The Hon'ble Delhi High Court in Crl. A . 98/2017, Sanjay Arora
v. Monika Singh relying upon the judgments of the Hon'ble Supreme
Court in Bharat Barrel & Drum MFG. Co. v. Amin Chand Payrelal
(1999) 3 SCC 35, M.M.T.C. Ltd. v. Medchl Chemicals &·Pharma (P)
Ltd. (2002) 1 SCC 234, Hiten P. Dalal v. Bratindranath Banerjee
(2001) 6 SSC 16, Malllavarappu Kasivisweswara Rao v. Thadikonda
Ramulu Firm (2008) 7 SCC 655 and Rangappa v. Sri. Mohan (2010)
11 SCC 441, it has been held that :-