Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 10 (0.33 seconds)
Dillip Kumar Biswal @ Dillip Biswal vs State Of Odisha ..... Opp. Party on 9 April, 2024 cites

Ram Nath International Construction ... vs State Of U.P on 21 October, 1997

8. Mr. Himanshu Sekhar Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that in view of the nature of allegations against the petitioners the proceedings itself not maintainable in view of the decision of the Apex Court in the case of Ram Nath vs. The State of Uttar Pradesh & Others reported in 2024 INSC 138 for which he Page 4 of 6 has filed CRLMC No. 4496 of 2023 with a prayer to quash the impugned order of cognizance dated 26.10.2021 and in the said case notice has been issued by this Court and further proceedings have been stayed. He further submits that in view of the nature of allegations against the petitioners the necessity of identification may not be necessary for which their personal appearance should not been insisted upon. He further submits that the petitioner no.1 is suffering various chronic diseases, while petitioner no.2 is a woman and insisting on their personal appearance will result in prejudice to them. He also submits that even if their personal appearance is dispensed with, the petitioners undertake to appear in the Court below as when their appearance will be necessary and they are directed to do so by the Court.
Supreme Court of India Cites 4 - Cited by 27 - S V Manohar - Full Document

Chintan Joshi vs Niranjan Behera .... Opposite Parties on 28 March, 2023

In support of her submission, that prayer for dispensing with the personal appearance should not been allowed in case of serious offences, she relies on the decision of the Supreme Court in the case of Lily Begum vs. Joy Chandra Nagbanshi reported in (1994) 2 Supreme Court Cases 39 and the decision of this Court in the case of Chintan Joshi vs. Niranjan Behera in CRLMC No. 2940 of 2022 decided on 11.04.2023.
Orissa High Court Cites 0 - Cited by 0 - S Mishra - Full Document
1