Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 15 (2.54 seconds)
Pratap Singh And Another vs Gurbaksh Singh on 29 January, 1962 cites

Saibal Kumar Gupta And Others vs B. K. Sen And Another on 13 January, 1961

"The record does not establish that at any time the appellant had made comments on the case under s. 497, Indian Penal Code, pending against B. K. Sen or in respect of any matter pending in connection with that case in the Calcutta High Court....The questionnaire nowhere suggested that B. K. Sen had made these appointments in order to suborn prosecution witnesses in that case or that he had made the appointments with a view to preventing Bimala Kanta Roy Choudhury from producing witnesses to prove his case against B. K. Sen....The Special Committee had embarked upon an enquiry on the directions of the Corporation in order to discover malpractice on the part of the Corporation's servants. Malpractices of the 864 part of a servant of the Corporation would presumably include making unworthy appointments. The ascertainment of the motive for the appointment would be merely incidental to the main purpose of the enquiry. It would be difficult to conclude therefrom that the Special Committee were holding a parallel enquiry on matters pending decision by a court of law and that thereby their action tended to interfere with the course of justice."
Supreme Court of India Cites 9 - Cited by 28 - S J Imam - Full Document

Shankar Lal Sharma vs M.S. Bisht on 17 October, 1955

The case reported as Shankar Lal Sharma v. M. S. Bisht(2) does go against the appellants. I however do not agree with the conclusion in that case that the calling for an explanation from the employee as to why he had submitted a writ application in the High Court, in contravention of certain directions contained in the Government Circular of 1952, was an attempt to hold out a threat of Departmental action against him in order to induce him to withdraw the application he had presented for the protection of his rights under the Constitution.
Allahabad High Court Cites 0 - Cited by 4 - Full Document
1   2 Next