Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 21 (0.49 seconds)The Factories Act, 1948
Section 2 in The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 [Entire Act]
Section 9 in The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 [Entire Act]
The Delhi Shops and Establishments Act, 1954
G.S. Puri vs Indian Oil Corporation on 9 February, 1996
Besides, he has no vested rights against his transfer from one
factory to another as it is a normal incidence of his service
besides, being prerogative of the management to transfer the
workman to the place of their choice keeping in view the
exigency of work. The proposition of law laid down by our own
Hon'ble High Court in G.S. Puri Vs. Indian Oil Corporation
(supra) and by the Hon'ble Rajasthan High Court in Kishori Lal
Verma Vs. Hindustan Zinc Ltd. & Anr. (supra) is squarely
applicable to the facts of this case. Therefore, this contention
Contd...
Kishori Lal Verma vs Hindustan Zinc Ltd. And Anr. on 19 August, 1994
Besides, he has no vested rights against his transfer from one
factory to another as it is a normal incidence of his service
besides, being prerogative of the management to transfer the
workman to the place of their choice keeping in view the
exigency of work. The proposition of law laid down by our own
Hon'ble High Court in G.S. Puri Vs. Indian Oil Corporation
(supra) and by the Hon'ble Rajasthan High Court in Kishori Lal
Verma Vs. Hindustan Zinc Ltd. & Anr. (supra) is squarely
applicable to the facts of this case. Therefore, this contention
Contd...
G. Srinivasan vs National Thermal Power Corporation ... on 12 February, 2002
(supra), Union of India & Anr. Vs. N.P. Thomas (supra) and
G. Srinivasan Vs. National Thermal Power Corporation,
Ltd. (supra) is squarely applicable to the case in hand.
Birla Corporation Ltd. vs First Industrial Tribunal And Ors. on 10 February, 2006
Hon'ble Calcutta High Court in the case of Birla
Corporation Ltd. Vs. First Industrial Tribunal and others
(supra) has laid down as under :-
Gen. Marketing And Manufacturing Co. ... vs The Presiding Officer And Others on 1 September, 1999
to any other factory or sale depot of the management anywhere
in Delhi or outside Delhi which was in existence as on the date
of his appointment but not to the factory / factories which were
set up by the management after his appointment. Such a
position cannot be accepted in law and it would make the very
condition of the service regarding transferability to any other
factory or sale depot in and outside Delhi redundant. The
proposition of law laid down by our own Hon'ble High Court in
General Marketing and Manufacturing Company Ltd. Vs.
Presiding Officer and others (supra) is squarely applicable to
the facts of this case. Applying the same, it is held that the
management had full legal right / power to transfer the workman
to Rama Road Factory even though it was not there at the time
of workman's appointment. In other words, there is no
substance in this contention of the workman.