Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 12 (0.19 seconds)
A.B. Pal Electricals Pvt. Ltd. vs Union Of India & Ors. on 17 December, 2019 cites

Bhargava Motors vs Union Of India & Ors. on 13 May, 2019

"10. Having carefully examined those decisions, the Court is unable to find any distinguishing feature that should deny the Petitioner a relief similar to the one granted in those cases. In those cases also, there was some error committed by the W.P.(C) 6537/2019 Page 4 of 8 Petitioners which they were unable to rectify in the TRAN-1 Form and as a result of which, they could not file the returns in TRAN-2 Form and avail of the credit which they were entitled to. In both the said decisions, the Court noticed that GST system is still in the „trial and error phase‟ insofar as its implementation is concerned. It was observed in Bhargava Motors (supra) as under:
Delhi High Court Cites 5 - Cited by 20 - S Muralidhar - Full Document

Asian Hotels Ltd., Taj Mahal Hotel, ... vs Government Of National Capital ... on 16 January, 2002

The said decision has also been followed by this court in M/s Aadinath Industries & Anr vs Union of India, W.P. (C) 9775/2019, decided on 20.09.2019; Lease Plan India Private Limited vs Government of National Capital Territory of Delhi and Ors, W.P.(C) 3309/2019, decided on 13.09.2019; Godrej & Boyce Mfg. Co. Ltd. Through its Branch Commercial Manager vs Union of India, W.P.(C) 8075/2019, decided on 15.10.2019.
Delhi High Court Cites 37 - Cited by 31 - S B Sinha - Full Document

Branch Manager, The United India ... vs Smt. P. Mamta And Ors. 47 Mac/2010/2018 ... on 20 February, 2019

The said decision has also been followed by this court in M/s Aadinath Industries & Anr vs Union of India, W.P. (C) 9775/2019, decided on 20.09.2019; Lease Plan India Private Limited vs Government of National Capital Territory of Delhi and Ors, W.P.(C) 3309/2019, decided on 13.09.2019; Godrej & Boyce Mfg. Co. Ltd. Through its Branch Commercial Manager vs Union of India, W.P.(C) 8075/2019, decided on 15.10.2019.
Chattisgarh High Court Cites 0 - Cited by 18 - Full Document

Tata Exports Limited vs Union Of India on 7 August, 1986

"10. The GST System is still in a „trial and error phase‟ as far as its implementation is concerned. Ever since the date the GSTN became operational, this Court has been approached by dealers facing genuine difficulties in filing returns, claiming input tax credit through the GST portal. The Court's attention has been drawn to a decision of the Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court dated 10th September, 2018 in W.P. (MD) No. 18532/2018 (Tara Exports v. Union of India) where after acknowledging the procedural difficulties in claiming input tax credit in the TRAN-1 form that Court directed the respondents "either to open the portal, so as to enable the petitioner to file the TRAN1 electronically for claiming the transitional credit or accept the manually filed TRAN1" and to allow the input credit claimed "after processing the same, if it is otherwise eligible in law".
Bombay High Court Cites 6 - Cited by 33 - Full Document
1   2 Next