Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 9 of 9 (0.19 seconds)

Sail And Anr. vs Awadhesh Singh And Ors. on 2 November, 2000

"10. Taking a comprehensive view of the present O.A. it is quite obvious that Sri K.C.Patra had died on his way to duty. While riding the bike his head reeled and he fell down unconscious on the road. The judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in SAIL & Another vs. Awadhesh Singh &Ors. (2001) 10 SCC 621 had specifically stated that a Memorandum of Agreement is not a statutory scheme and would be unenforceable in an application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. However, the point in dispute in the above case was whether the Memorandum of Agreement with the National Joint Committee for Steel Industry permits an appointment on the death of an employee to one of the dependents of the deceased employee if some other dependent of the deceased employee is already in service. The facts in the present case are different. No other employee of the applicant's family is inservice and therefore, the issue of compassionate appointment to the applicant no.2 due to the death of his father while going to duty is quite open. The Memorandum of Settlement between the Management of RSP and Rourkela Shramik Singh quite clearly stipulates that when an employee dies while going to work his ward should be eligible for compassionate appointment (Section-3.4.5.1.(f)].
Supreme Court of India Cites 2 - Cited by 22 - B N Agrawal - Full Document

U.P.Rajya Sadak Parivahan Nigam Thru ... vs Parasnath And 3 Others on 19 January, 2010

In Haryana SEB vs. NareshTanswar (1996) 8 SCC 23, Santosh Kumar Dubey v. State of UP, (2009) 6 SCC 481, Haryana SEB vs. Krishna Devi (2002)10SCC 246, State of U.P. vs. ParasNath 1998, (1998) 2 SCC 412 and National Hydroelectric Power Corporation vs. Nanak Chand (2004) 12 SCC 487, the Hon'ble Apex Court had recognized the need for providing compassionate appointment when the family of the deceased is in dire needs.
Allahabad High Court Cites 0 - Cited by 9 - D P Singh - Full Document

National Hydroelectric Power ... vs Nanak Chand & Anr on 15 October, 2004

In Haryana SEB vs. NareshTanswar (1996) 8 SCC 23, Santosh Kumar Dubey v. State of UP, (2009) 6 SCC 481, Haryana SEB vs. Krishna Devi (2002)10SCC 246, State of U.P. vs. ParasNath 1998, (1998) 2 SCC 412 and National Hydroelectric Power Corporation vs. Nanak Chand (2004) 12 SCC 487, the Hon'ble Apex Court had recognized the need for providing compassionate appointment when the family of the deceased is in dire needs.
Supreme Court of India Cites 12 - Cited by 626 - A Pasayat - Full Document
1