Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 2 of 2 (0.16 seconds)
Rajeev Singh vs Chhatrapati Shahuji Maharaj ... on 1 October, 2004 cites

Rajiv Ratna Shukla And Anr. vs University Of Allahabad And Ors. on 18 July, 1986

16. The Court is aware that the petitioners who have passed even after re-evaluation of their answer sheets would also be subjected to re-examination in the paper concerned. This may cause some injustice to such students. However, this Court cannot hold the examination of the particular paper in which there has been mass copying to be treated valid for some students and invalid for the other students. The examination of a particular paper regarding which there is a report of mass copying in fact is no examination in the eye of law and such an examination has to be declared Invalid for all purposes. At this stage it is worthwhile to reproduce the relevant portion of the judgment of this Court in the case of Rajiv Ratna Shukla v. University of Allahabad (supra) :
Allahabad High Court Cites 1 - Cited by 12 - R M Sahai - Full Document

Chairman, J&K State Board Of Education vs Feyaz Ahmed Malik & Ors on 28 January, 2000

13. For the said purpose the University has constituted Flying Squad in order to maintain standard and to conduct the examinations so as to appraise the real worth of every student appearing in the said examinations without any assistance from outside source. If the said Flying Squad submits a report about mass copying at the particular centre/centres on particular day/days, the examination committee constituted by the University considers the said reports of mass copying and directs appropriate action thereon, no illegality or infirmity can be alleged nor can be entertained in writ proceedings. Thus, if the University, in the facts of the present case, has placed reliance on the reports of the Flying Squad for coming to the conclusion that there has been mass copying at the particular centres on particular dates, from where the petitioners were undertaking examinations, it cannot be said that the said decision of the University is based on no material evidence.
Supreme Court of India Cites 3 - Cited by 395 - M J Rao - Full Document
1