Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 16 (0.26 seconds)

Ramachandra Shenoy And Another vs Mrs. Hilda Brite And Others on 1 April, 1963

164) has stated that the latter clause in a Will should be preferred over the earlier, if the earlier clause is not clear and/or ambiguous. Supreme Court in Ramachandra Shenoy v. Mrs.Hilda Brite (AIR 1964 SC 1323) has held that resort to Section 88 of the Act shall be taken only when there is a conflict between the earlier clause and latter clause in a Will. In otherwords, the rule under Section 88 of the Act shall be invoked only if there is irreconcilability between two dispositions in the Will.
Supreme Court of India Cites 4 - Cited by 106 - N R Ayyangar - Full Document
1   2 Next