Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 19 (0.29 seconds)Section 188 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Section 420 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Article 226 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Section 406 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 467 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Rajiv Thapar & Ors vs Madan Lal Kapoor on 23 January, 2013
In Rajiv Thapar & Ors. v. Madan Lal Kapoor (2013 (2)
KLT Suppl.5 (SC) = (2013) 3 SCC 330)), the Apex Court
delineated the following steps to determine the veracity of a
prayer for quashment raised by an accused by invoking the
power vested in the High Court under Section 482 of Cr.P.C.:-
Section 408 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
State Of Kerala & Ors vs O.C.Kuttan & Ors on 17 February, 1999
In State of Kerala v. O.C.Kuttan (1999 (1) KLT 747
(SC) = (1999) 2 SCC 651), the Apex Court held that while exercising
the power, it is not possible for the Court to sift the materials or to
weigh the materials and then come to the conclusion one way or the
other.
State Of U.P vs O.P. Sharma on 6 February, 1996
In State of U.P v. O.P.Sharma (1996 (1) KLT OnLine 997 (SC)
= (1996) 7 SCC 705) a Three Judge Bench of the Apex Court observed
that the High Court should be loath to interfere at the threshold
to thwart the prosecution exercising its inherent power under Section
482 Cr.P.C. or under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India,
as the case may be, and allow the law to take its own course.