Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 12 (0.31 seconds)Section 489C in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 120B in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
The Indian Penal Code, 1860
Section 293 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
C. Ronald & Anr vs State, U.T. Of Andaman & Nicobar Islands on 10 August, 2011
472) and C. Ronald & Anr. V. State of U.T. of Andaman &
Nicobar reported in (2011) 8 SCLR 041 wherein the Hon'ble Apex
Court has observed in clear crystal term that--
Section 45 in The Indian Evidence Act, 1872 [Entire Act]
Section 313 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Md. Muktarul Islam @ Suman vs State Of West Bengal on 24 March, 2014
In case of Md. Muktarul Islam @ Suman v. State of West
Bengal (2014) 2 CAL LT. 260 the appellant went to Co-operative
Bank to deposit 16 notes of Rs. 500/- denomination each which were
tested by the Bank in a machine and found the same to be fake and
counterfeit. It was observed in paragraph 11 as follows:
Umashanker vs State Of Chhattisgarh on 5 October, 2001
In case of Umashanker v. State of Chhattisgarh (AIR 2001
SC 3074), the accused aged 18 years a student was alleged to have
been paid fake currency note of Rs. 100/- to a shop-keeper, 13 more
such fake currency notes were received from him but there was no
material brought on record to show that accused had requisite mens
rea. It was held that merely on the basis of evidence of shop-keeper
and other witnesses that they were able to make out that currency
notes alleged to have been given to shop-keeper was fake, mens rea
cannot be presumed. There was no specific question with regard to
currency note being fake put to accused. Hence he was acquitted by
the Hon'ble apex Court.