Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 34 (0.26 seconds)
Balak Ram vs State Of U.P. And 6 Others on 20 April, 2023 cites

Faqruddin (D) Th.Lrs vs Tajuddin (D) Th.Lrs on 16 May, 2008

Similar view has been expressed in the cases of Suman Verma v. Union of India (2004) 12 SCC 58; Faqruddin v. Tajuddin (2008) 8 SCC 12; Rajinder Singh v. State of J&K, (2008) 9 SCC 368; Municipal Corporation v. State of Maharashtra, (2015) 16 SCC 689; T. Ravi v. B. Chinna Narasimha (2017) 7 SCC 342; Bhimabai Mahadeo Kambekar v. Arthur Import & Export Co. (2019) 3 SCC 191; Prahlad Pradhan v. Sonu Kumhar, (2019) 10 SCC 259; and Ajit Kaur v. Darshan Singh, (2019) 13 SCC 70."
Supreme Court of India Cites 24 - Cited by 60 - S B Sinha - Full Document

Bhimabai Mahadeo Kambekar (Dead) Thr. ... vs Arthur Import & Export Co.. on 31 January, 2019

12. The proposition that mutation entries in revenue records do not create or extinguish title over land nor such entries have any presumptive value on title has been restated in a recent decision in the case of Bhimabai Mahadeo Kambekar Vs. Arthur Import and Export Company & Ors. (2019) 3 SCC 191, placing reliance upon earlier decisions in Balwant Singh Vs. Daulat Singh (1997) 7 SCC 137 and Narasamma Vs. State of Karnataka (209) 5 SCC 591 . The observations made in the judgment are as follows:-
Supreme Court of India Cites 2 - Cited by 119 - A M Sapre - Full Document

Suraj Bhan & Ors vs Financial Commissioner & Ors on 16 April, 2007

In the case of Suraj Bhan v. Financial Commissioner (2007) 6 SCC 186, it is observed and held by this Court that an entry in revenue records does not confer title on a person whose name appears in record-of-rights. Entries in the revenue records or jamabandi have only "fiscal purpose", i.e., payment of land revenue, and no ownership is conferred on the basis of such entries. It is further observed that so far as the title of the property is concerned, it can only be decided by a competent Civil Court.
Supreme Court of India Cites 4 - Cited by 201 - C K Thakker - Full Document

Smt. Sawarni vs Smt. Inder Kaur And Others on 23 August, 1996

16. A similar view was taken in the case of Sawarni (Smt.) Vs. Inder Kaur (Smt.) and others, (1996) 6 SCC 223 and it was observed that the mutation of name in the revenue records does not have the effect of creating or extinguishing the title nor has any presumptive value on title and it only enables the person concerned to pay land revenue. It was stated thus :-
Supreme Court of India Cites 3 - Cited by 285 - K Ramaswamy - Full Document
1   2 3 4 Next