Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 12 (0.26 seconds)

Ambuja Cements Limited vs State Of Chhattisgarh on 8 January, 2016

7. The amendments to the notification dated 29.9.1997 are not in consonance with Section 9 of the Act which provides for gazette publication of amendments to Schedules II and III of the Act. There is no denial to this specific assertion made in Writ Petition (T) No.3859/2010 (Ambuja Cements Limited vs. State of Chhattisgarh & Ors), Writ Petition No.4218/2010 (A.C.C Ltd vs. State of Chhattisgarh & Ors), Writ Petition (T) No.141/2014 (A.C.C Ltd. vs. State of Chhattisgarh & Ors) and Writ Petition (T) No.142/2014 (Ambuja Cements Limited vs. State of Chhattisgarh & Ors).
Chattisgarh High Court Cites 0 - Cited by 1 - P K Mishra - Full Document

K M C - S K A ( J V ) Construction Company Pvt. ... vs State Of Chhattisgarh on 5 January, 2016

7. The amendments to the notification dated 29.9.1997 are not in consonance with Section 9 of the Act which provides for gazette publication of amendments to Schedules II and III of the Act. There is no denial to this specific assertion made in Writ Petition (T) No.3859/2010 (Ambuja Cements Limited vs. State of Chhattisgarh & Ors), Writ Petition No.4218/2010 (A.C.C Ltd vs. State of Chhattisgarh & Ors), Writ Petition (T) No.141/2014 (A.C.C Ltd. vs. State of Chhattisgarh & Ors) and Writ Petition (T) No.142/2014 (Ambuja Cements Limited vs. State of Chhattisgarh & Ors).
Chattisgarh High Court Cites 0 - Cited by 1 - Full Document

Hotel Balaji And Others Etc. Etc vs State Of Andhra Pradesh And Ors. Etc. Etc on 22 October, 1992

20. The Respondents by purporting to enhance entry tax on limestone if stock transferred outside the State after clinkerisation were essentially seeking to compensate themselves for loss of revenue from sale of cement which would have accrued by sales tax if the cement had been manufactured and sold in the State. The unsustainability of the contention on behalf of the State is evident from the observations in Hotel Balaji (supra) relied upon by the Petitioners observing as follows:-
Supreme Court of India Cites 54 - Cited by 133 - Full Document
1   2 Next