Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 10 (0.31 seconds)Article 227 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Article 14 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Article 19 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Article 21 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
THE PAYMENT OF GRATUITY ACT, 1972
D.D.Tewari (D) Thr. Lrs vs Uttar Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam ... on 1 August, 2014
9. To substantiate his submission, learned Senior
counsel for the Petitioner relied on the Judgments of
Supreme Court in DD Tewari (D) through LRs v. Uttar
Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam Ltd., reported in (2014) 8
SCC 894, and in S.K. Dua v. State of Haryana and
others, reported in (2008) 3 SCC 44, in which the Supreme
Court held that even in absence of statutory rules,
administrative instructions or guidelines, an employee can
claim interest for delayed payment of pensionary benefits.
Thus, the Petitioner is entitled for interest on the delayed
payment of his pensionary benefits from Opposite Party
Nos.1 & 2, which was wrongly withheld by the port
authorities from 2007 till 2014, i.e., for about 7 years, for
no fault of the Petitioner.
S.K. Dua vs State Of Haryana & Anr on 9 January, 2008
(Emphasis supplied)
Similarly, in S.K. Dua (supra), the Supreme
Court held as follows:
State Of Kerala And Ors vs M. Padmanabhan Nair on 17 December, 1984
(Emphasis supplied)
In DD Tewari (D) (Supra), relying on the
judgment in State of Kerala (supra), the Supreme Court
held as follows:
Up Roadways Retired Officials And ... vs State Of U.P. on 28 August, 2023
(Emphasis supplied)
In a recent judgment in Uttar Pradesh
Roadways Retired Officials and Officers Association
W.P.(C) No.17272 of 2016 Page 37 of 40
Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and another, reported in
(2024) 9 SCC 331, the Supreme Court held been held as
follows:
1