Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 7 of 7 (0.26 seconds)Section 11 in The Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act, 1947 [Entire Act]
Section 13 in The Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act, 1947 [Entire Act]
The Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act, 1947
Roshan Lal vs Madan Lal on 18 September, 1975
In Roshan Lal's case, one of us (Untwalia J.)
Vora Abbasbhai Alimahomed vs Haji Gulamnabi Haji Safibhai on 22 October, 1963
In Vora Abbasbhai Alimahmomed v. Haji Gulamnabi Haji Safi-
bhai(1) Shah J, as he then was, delivering the judgment of
this Court pointed out that when the conditions of clause
Nagindas Ramdas vs Dalpatram Ichharam @ Brijram And Ors on 30 November, 1973
following
Nagindaes case reiterated the same view. At page 882
delivering the judgment of this Court, it has been said
"The Court can pass a decree, on the basis of
the compromise. In such a situation the only
thing to be seen is whether the compromise is
in violation of the requirement of the law.
In other words, parties cannot be permitted to
have a tenants eviction merely by agreement
without anything more. The compromise must
indicate either on its. face or in the
background of other materials in the case that
the tenant expressly or impliedly is agreeing
to suffer a decree for eviction because the
landlord, in the circumstances, is entitled to
have such a decree under the law."
1