Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 4 of 4 (0.22 seconds)
Fact Employees Organization (Bms) vs Fertilizers And Chemicals Travancore ... on 27 January, 2025
cites
Dcit, Circle- 13(2), New Delhi vs Jiva Ayurvedic Pharmacy Ltd., New Delhi on 23 August, 2019
In a similar case; Noida v. B. D. Singhal [(2021) 17 SCC 435], the
Supreme Court considered the decision of the competent authority
enhancing the age of superannuation with particular date. Such a
decision has been upheld by the Supreme Court holding that the giving
effect to the enhanced age of retirement would fall within the realm
of the policy decision and the Court should not interfere with policy
decision in such a matter.
The State Of Jharkhand vs Brahmputra Metallics Limited on 1 December, 2020
In State of Jharkhand v. Brahmputra Metallics Ltd., this Court speaking
through one of us (D.Y. Chandrachud, J.) elaborated on the doctrine of
legitimate expectation, which is grounded in fairness and reasonableness
Explaining that there is a legitimate expectation that the actions of the
17
W.P.(C)No. 11389 OF 2023 &
Connection
2025:KER:6738
State are fair and reasonable, it was observed: (SCC para 50)
"50. .............. The State must discard the colonial notion
that it is a sovereign handing out doles at its will. Its policies
give rise to legitimate expectations that the State will act
according to what it puts forth in the public realm. In all its
actions, the State is bound to act fairly, in a transparent
manner. This is an elementary requirement of the
guarantee against arbitrary Stare action which Article 14 of
the Constitution adopts." (emphasis supplied)
Noida vs Amar Singh (D) Thru Lrs. on 29 August, 2014
It would be apt to extract the relevant
paragraph of the said decision of the Supreme Court in the case of
Noida v. B. D. Singhal (supra).
1