Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 16 (0.46 seconds)
Ram Laulin Rai And Ors vs The State Of Bihar And Ors on 12 May, 2023 cites

Ram Tapeshwar Sah And Ors. vs The State Of Bihar And Ors. [Alongwith ... on 13 July, 2006

It is pointed out that in the case of Ram Tapeshwar Sah (supra) and other analogous matters, by filing a reply to the counter affidavit, the learned Additional Advocate General-II categorically submitted on behalf of the Patna High Court CWJC No.11533 of 2018 dt.12-05-2023 45/54 respondents- State Government that " the case of the petitioners who are fulfilling the eligibility criteria as per the aforesaid policy will be considered and finalized on or before 30 th September, 2006 and the inter-se seniority will be fixed on the basis of the initial entry in the work or service..."
Patna High Court Cites 10 - Cited by 48 - Full Document

Dina Nath Jha And Ors vs The State Of Bihar And Ors on 17 April, 2023

What transpires from the chart enclosed with the minutes of the meeting (Annexure 'R') is that most of the petitioners who are eligible and whose name appear in the seniority list could not be absorbed in want of availability of posts. Learned counsel for the petitioners in CWJC No. 20837/2018 (Dina Nath Jha & Ors. Vs. The State of Bihar and Ors.) as also in CWJC No. 9149/2019 (Bhuneshwar Chaudhary Vs. The State of Bihar and Ors.) have strongly contested this information furnished in the chart. Learned counsel for the petitioners have prima-facie shown from the averments made in the writ applications as also the enclosures thereto that the persons placed below in the seniority list have been absorbed and in the Division such as Purnea Division there are still vacant posts. It is stated that two of the petitioners in CWJC No. 20837/2018 have attained the age of superannuation during pendency of this writ Patna High Court CWJC No.11533 of 2018 dt.12-05-2023 34/54 application. There are specific statements to this effect in paragraph '25' to the writ application and in support of the vacancy, learned counsel has relied upon Annexure '7' to the writ application. There is no denial to the same on the record. Similarly Mr. Siyaram Shahi, learned counsel representing the petitioners in CWJC No. 9149/2019, CWJC No. 21407/2019 and CWJC No. 8964/2019 has submitted that these petitioners are present in the seniority list of the Munger Division. It is submitted that in the Munger Division also the vacancies are available and out of twenty eight (28), nine (9) vacancies are still there. It is submitted that there is no reason as to why the posts which were specially created to absorb the daily wagers like the present petitioners would not be filled up from amongst those whose names appear in the seniority list.
Patna High Court - Orders Cites 1 - Cited by 34 - R R Prasad - Full Document

Bhuneshwar Prasad Chaudhary vs The State Of Bihar & Ors on 11 July, 2014

What transpires from the chart enclosed with the minutes of the meeting (Annexure 'R') is that most of the petitioners who are eligible and whose name appear in the seniority list could not be absorbed in want of availability of posts. Learned counsel for the petitioners in CWJC No. 20837/2018 (Dina Nath Jha & Ors. Vs. The State of Bihar and Ors.) as also in CWJC No. 9149/2019 (Bhuneshwar Chaudhary Vs. The State of Bihar and Ors.) have strongly contested this information furnished in the chart. Learned counsel for the petitioners have prima-facie shown from the averments made in the writ applications as also the enclosures thereto that the persons placed below in the seniority list have been absorbed and in the Division such as Purnea Division there are still vacant posts. It is stated that two of the petitioners in CWJC No. 20837/2018 have attained the age of superannuation during pendency of this writ Patna High Court CWJC No.11533 of 2018 dt.12-05-2023 34/54 application. There are specific statements to this effect in paragraph '25' to the writ application and in support of the vacancy, learned counsel has relied upon Annexure '7' to the writ application. There is no denial to the same on the record. Similarly Mr. Siyaram Shahi, learned counsel representing the petitioners in CWJC No. 9149/2019, CWJC No. 21407/2019 and CWJC No. 8964/2019 has submitted that these petitioners are present in the seniority list of the Munger Division. It is submitted that in the Munger Division also the vacancies are available and out of twenty eight (28), nine (9) vacancies are still there. It is submitted that there is no reason as to why the posts which were specially created to absorb the daily wagers like the present petitioners would not be filled up from amongst those whose names appear in the seniority list.
Patna High Court - Orders Cites 0 - Cited by 67 - Full Document

Binod Kumar vs Registrar General Patna High Court & Ors on 5 October, 2018

At this stage, Mr. Siyaram Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioners in some of the writ applications rose to submit that the statement given by the Executive Engineer is not correct. He has placed before this Court a copy of the Judgment dated 12.12.2022 passed in CWJC No. 11799 of 2018 (Binod Ram and Ors. Vs. the State Patna High Court CWJC No.11533 of 2018 dt.12-05-2023 38/54 of Bihar & Ors.) to submit that Binod Ram happened to be a candidate from Scheduled Castes Category and his name appears in the seniority list of Samastipur Division. There are other three persons who were petitioners in the said writ petition and they belong to Scheduled Castes. It is submitted that this Court is being misled by saying that there is no candidate in the seniority list from amongst the Scheduled Castes Category. Learned counsel further submits that despite the direction of this Court vide Judgment dated 12.12.2022 in CWJC No. 11799 of 2018, the petitioners have not been taken back. The Executive Engineer, Samastipur initially made a statement that they have been taken back but very soon, he realised that his statement may not be correct, therefore, he has submitted that in this regard he will make statement by 2:15 P.M. today. Mr. Subodh Shankar, Executive Engineer, Darbhanga has informed that 54 posts were created for this Division out of which 52 posts were filled up. The two remaining posts belong to the unreserved female, since there is no candidate from unreserved female, the posts remained vacant.
Patna High Court - Orders Cites 0 - Cited by 34 - D K Singh - Full Document

Surendra Narain Singh & Ors vs State Of Bihar & Ors on 24 April, 1998

Mr. Singh, learned counsel has further brought to the notice of this Court that in case of Chapra Division in the matter of Surendra Singh and Others versus State of Bihar and Others, they were absorbed after de-reserving the posts which had remained vacant due to non-availability of the candidates under the reserved category. At 2:15 P.M., the Executive Engineer, P.H. Division, Samastipur appeared with Mr. S. Raza Ahmad, AAG-5 and submitted that the consequential order reinstating Binod Ram and Others has been issued.
Supreme Court of India Cites 9 - Cited by 508 - S P Kurdukar - Full Document

Rajeev Ranjan Kumar Singh vs The State Of Bihar & Ors on 18 December, 2017

15. That from perusal of the detailed chart annexed with the report dated 09.05.2023, it is evident that the petitioner Rajeev Kumar Singh of CWJC No. 5064/2017 (Rajeev Kumar Singh versus the State of Bihar and others), petitioner Dharmnath Singh, Rameshwar Singh, Ramashish Ram of CWJC No. 7691 of 2018 (Dharmnath Singh and others versus The State of Bihar and others), petitioner Ram Chandra Kumar @ Ram Chandra Singh of CWJC No. 7760 of 2018 (Ram Chandra Kumar @ Ram Chandra Singh versus The State of Bihar and others), petitioner Ram Udit Singh of CWJC No. 9804 of 2018 (Ramlaulin Rai and others versus The State of Bihar and others), petitioner Patna High Court CWJC No.11533 of 2018 dt.12-05-2023 52/54 Kanhaiya Prasad of CWJC No. 14337 of 2018 (Rajeshwar Prasad and another versus The State of Bihar and others), petitioners Abhay Kumar Verma, Gajendra Kumar Mishra, Pravin Kumar Mallik of CWJC No. 13726 of 2018 (Virendra Kumar Bhagat and others versus The State of Bihar and others), petitioners Dinanath Jha, Devanand Jha, Shashi Chandra Jha, Shashi Nath Jha of CWJC No. 20837 of 2018 (Dinanath Jha and others versus The State of Bihar and others), petitioner Rajwansh Lal of CWJC No. 13895 of 2018 (Rajwansh Lal Versus The State of Bihar and others), petitioner Ajay Kumar of CWJC No. 8964 of 2019 (Ajay Kumar versus The State of Bihar and others), petitioner Bhuneshwar Chaudhary of CWJC No. 9149 of 2019 (Bhuneshar Choudhary versus The State of Bihar and others), petitioner Ramchandra Singh of CWJC No. 9237 of 2018 (Ramchandra Singh and others versus The State of Bihar and others), petitioners Ashwini Kumar Singh, Manish Kumar Chaudhary, Anil Kumar @ Anil Kumar Singh of CWJC No. 14960 of 2022 (Ashwini Kumar Singh and others versus The State of Bihar and others) may come under zone of consideration if the inter se seniority will be decided on the basis of date of entry in service.
Patna High Court Cites 0 - Cited by 34 - J Saran - Full Document

Dharmnath Singh & Ors vs The State Of Bihar & Ors on 13 August, 2018

15. That from perusal of the detailed chart annexed with the report dated 09.05.2023, it is evident that the petitioner Rajeev Kumar Singh of CWJC No. 5064/2017 (Rajeev Kumar Singh versus the State of Bihar and others), petitioner Dharmnath Singh, Rameshwar Singh, Ramashish Ram of CWJC No. 7691 of 2018 (Dharmnath Singh and others versus The State of Bihar and others), petitioner Ram Chandra Kumar @ Ram Chandra Singh of CWJC No. 7760 of 2018 (Ram Chandra Kumar @ Ram Chandra Singh versus The State of Bihar and others), petitioner Ram Udit Singh of CWJC No. 9804 of 2018 (Ramlaulin Rai and others versus The State of Bihar and others), petitioner Patna High Court CWJC No.11533 of 2018 dt.12-05-2023 52/54 Kanhaiya Prasad of CWJC No. 14337 of 2018 (Rajeshwar Prasad and another versus The State of Bihar and others), petitioners Abhay Kumar Verma, Gajendra Kumar Mishra, Pravin Kumar Mallik of CWJC No. 13726 of 2018 (Virendra Kumar Bhagat and others versus The State of Bihar and others), petitioners Dinanath Jha, Devanand Jha, Shashi Chandra Jha, Shashi Nath Jha of CWJC No. 20837 of 2018 (Dinanath Jha and others versus The State of Bihar and others), petitioner Rajwansh Lal of CWJC No. 13895 of 2018 (Rajwansh Lal Versus The State of Bihar and others), petitioner Ajay Kumar of CWJC No. 8964 of 2019 (Ajay Kumar versus The State of Bihar and others), petitioner Bhuneshwar Chaudhary of CWJC No. 9149 of 2019 (Bhuneshar Choudhary versus The State of Bihar and others), petitioner Ramchandra Singh of CWJC No. 9237 of 2018 (Ramchandra Singh and others versus The State of Bihar and others), petitioners Ashwini Kumar Singh, Manish Kumar Chaudhary, Anil Kumar @ Anil Kumar Singh of CWJC No. 14960 of 2022 (Ashwini Kumar Singh and others versus The State of Bihar and others) may come under zone of consideration if the inter se seniority will be decided on the basis of date of entry in service.
Patna High Court Cites 1 - Cited by 34 - S Pandey - Full Document

Ram Chandra Kumar @ Ram Chandra Singh And ... vs The State Of Bihar And Ors on 17 April, 2023

15. That from perusal of the detailed chart annexed with the report dated 09.05.2023, it is evident that the petitioner Rajeev Kumar Singh of CWJC No. 5064/2017 (Rajeev Kumar Singh versus the State of Bihar and others), petitioner Dharmnath Singh, Rameshwar Singh, Ramashish Ram of CWJC No. 7691 of 2018 (Dharmnath Singh and others versus The State of Bihar and others), petitioner Ram Chandra Kumar @ Ram Chandra Singh of CWJC No. 7760 of 2018 (Ram Chandra Kumar @ Ram Chandra Singh versus The State of Bihar and others), petitioner Ram Udit Singh of CWJC No. 9804 of 2018 (Ramlaulin Rai and others versus The State of Bihar and others), petitioner Patna High Court CWJC No.11533 of 2018 dt.12-05-2023 52/54 Kanhaiya Prasad of CWJC No. 14337 of 2018 (Rajeshwar Prasad and another versus The State of Bihar and others), petitioners Abhay Kumar Verma, Gajendra Kumar Mishra, Pravin Kumar Mallik of CWJC No. 13726 of 2018 (Virendra Kumar Bhagat and others versus The State of Bihar and others), petitioners Dinanath Jha, Devanand Jha, Shashi Chandra Jha, Shashi Nath Jha of CWJC No. 20837 of 2018 (Dinanath Jha and others versus The State of Bihar and others), petitioner Rajwansh Lal of CWJC No. 13895 of 2018 (Rajwansh Lal Versus The State of Bihar and others), petitioner Ajay Kumar of CWJC No. 8964 of 2019 (Ajay Kumar versus The State of Bihar and others), petitioner Bhuneshwar Chaudhary of CWJC No. 9149 of 2019 (Bhuneshar Choudhary versus The State of Bihar and others), petitioner Ramchandra Singh of CWJC No. 9237 of 2018 (Ramchandra Singh and others versus The State of Bihar and others), petitioners Ashwini Kumar Singh, Manish Kumar Chaudhary, Anil Kumar @ Anil Kumar Singh of CWJC No. 14960 of 2022 (Ashwini Kumar Singh and others versus The State of Bihar and others) may come under zone of consideration if the inter se seniority will be decided on the basis of date of entry in service.
Patna High Court - Orders Cites 1 - Cited by 34 - R R Prasad - Full Document

Brajeshwar Prasad Singh & Anr vs The State Of Bihar Through The Chief ... on 6 October, 2015

15. That from perusal of the detailed chart annexed with the report dated 09.05.2023, it is evident that the petitioner Rajeev Kumar Singh of CWJC No. 5064/2017 (Rajeev Kumar Singh versus the State of Bihar and others), petitioner Dharmnath Singh, Rameshwar Singh, Ramashish Ram of CWJC No. 7691 of 2018 (Dharmnath Singh and others versus The State of Bihar and others), petitioner Ram Chandra Kumar @ Ram Chandra Singh of CWJC No. 7760 of 2018 (Ram Chandra Kumar @ Ram Chandra Singh versus The State of Bihar and others), petitioner Ram Udit Singh of CWJC No. 9804 of 2018 (Ramlaulin Rai and others versus The State of Bihar and others), petitioner Patna High Court CWJC No.11533 of 2018 dt.12-05-2023 52/54 Kanhaiya Prasad of CWJC No. 14337 of 2018 (Rajeshwar Prasad and another versus The State of Bihar and others), petitioners Abhay Kumar Verma, Gajendra Kumar Mishra, Pravin Kumar Mallik of CWJC No. 13726 of 2018 (Virendra Kumar Bhagat and others versus The State of Bihar and others), petitioners Dinanath Jha, Devanand Jha, Shashi Chandra Jha, Shashi Nath Jha of CWJC No. 20837 of 2018 (Dinanath Jha and others versus The State of Bihar and others), petitioner Rajwansh Lal of CWJC No. 13895 of 2018 (Rajwansh Lal Versus The State of Bihar and others), petitioner Ajay Kumar of CWJC No. 8964 of 2019 (Ajay Kumar versus The State of Bihar and others), petitioner Bhuneshwar Chaudhary of CWJC No. 9149 of 2019 (Bhuneshar Choudhary versus The State of Bihar and others), petitioner Ramchandra Singh of CWJC No. 9237 of 2018 (Ramchandra Singh and others versus The State of Bihar and others), petitioners Ashwini Kumar Singh, Manish Kumar Chaudhary, Anil Kumar @ Anil Kumar Singh of CWJC No. 14960 of 2022 (Ashwini Kumar Singh and others versus The State of Bihar and others) may come under zone of consideration if the inter se seniority will be decided on the basis of date of entry in service.
Patna High Court Cites 1 - Cited by 34 - A K Singh - Full Document
1   2 Next