Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 10 (0.21 seconds)Northern Plastics Ltd. (Now Merged With ... vs Collector Of Customs And Central Excise on 17 September, 1999
In the case of Northern Plastics Ltd. v. Collector of Customs & Central Excise, reported in (2000) 1 SCC 545, the Supreme Court held that the value of the goods as on the date or time when the goods ought to have been cleared or to be returned, an interest was also allowed in favour of the appellant of the said case.
Section 120B in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 379 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 406 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 461 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 6A in The Essential Commodities Act, 1955 [Entire Act]
The Essential Commodities Act, 1955
N.Nagendra Rao & Co vs State Of A.P on 6 September, 1994
9. It is not in dispute that the respondents seized the goods of the petitioner Anil Kumar and it was in their custody, when the theft took place. In the aforesaid background and in view of earlier direction of the Court, the respondents cannot deny return of the seized materials or refund of the amount equivalent to the theft seized materials. Similar matter fell for consideration before the Supreme Court in the case of N. Nagendra Rao & Company v. State of Andhra Pradesh, AIR 1994 SC 2663, wherein, taking into consideration the provisions of Section 6-C(2) of the Essential Commodities Act, the Court held as follows :--
Section 33 in The Finance Act, 2018 [Entire Act]
1