Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 12 (0.50 seconds)Satender Kumar Antil vs Central Bureau Of Investigation on 11 July, 2022
Para 6 of the Satender Kumar Antil (supra) decided on 07.10.2021 is being quoted as under:
Section 88 in The Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 [Entire Act]
The Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881
Section 482 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Section 138 in The Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 [Entire Act]
Prof. Bhim Singh vs Union Of India Union Home Secretary ... on 5 September, 2014
100.10. An exercise will have to be done in a similar manner to comply with the mandate of Section 436-A of the Code both at the district judiciary level and the High Court as earlier directed by this Court in Bhim Singh [Bhim Singh v. Union of India, (2015) 13 SCC 605 : (2016) 1 SCC (Cri) 663] , followed by appropriate orders.
Arnesh Kumar vs State Of Bihar & Anr on 2 July, 2014
100.2. The investigating agencies and their officers are duty-bound to comply with the mandate of Sections 41 and 41-A of the Code and the directions issued by this Court in Arnesh Kumar [Arnesh Kumar v. State of Bihar, (2014) 8 SCC 273 : (2014) 3 SCC (Cri) 449]. Any dereliction on their part has to be brought to the notice of the higher authorities by the court followed by appropriate action.
Amandeep Singh Johar vs State Of Nct Of Delhi & Anr on 7 February, 2018
100.4. All the State Governments and the Union Territories are directed to facilitate Standing Orders for the procedure to be followed under Section 41 and 41-A of the Code while taking note of the order of the High Court of Delhi dated 7-2-2018 in Amandeep Singh Johar v. State (NCT of Delhi) [Amandeep Singh Johar v. State (NCT of Delhi), 2018 SCC OnLine Del 13448] and the Standing Order issued by Delhi Police i.e. Standing Order 109 of 2020, to comply with the mandate of Section 41-A of the Code.
Siddharth Narain Dikshit vs State Of U.P.Thr.Prin.Secy.Secondary ... on 24 August, 2021
100.6. There needs to be a strict compliance of the mandate laid down in the judgment of this Court in Siddharth [Siddharth v. State of U.P., (2022) 1 SCC 676 : (2022) 1 SCC (Cri) 423].