Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 9 of 9 (0.33 seconds)

Vodafone Essar Cellular Ltd vs Pune Iii on 18 December, 2013

- Mumbai) and in Vodafone Cellular Ltd. v. CCE, Pune-III, 2014 (34) STR 890 (Tri.-Mumbai) while also upholding the applicability of Circular No. 111/5/2009-S.T. dt. 24.02.2009 to the present circumstances. The order also upheld the reliance placed on the decision of the Tribunal in Paul Merchants Ltd. 2013 (29) 7 ST/41798/2014 & ST/401312016 S.T.R. 257 (Tri. - Del.) as binding precedent for the issue under consideration. Therefore, appellant submits that International Inbound Roaming will not be liable to service tax. The appellant further prays that where the demand is itself not sustainable, the levy of interest and imposition of penalty is not tenable.
Custom, Excise & Service Tax Tribunal Cites 7 - Cited by 8 - Full Document

Verizon Communication India Pvt. Ltd. vs Assistant Commissioner, Service Tax, ... on 12 September, 2017

3.4 The reliance placed by the ld. counsel on the decision in the case of Verizon Communication India Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Assistant Commissioner of Service Tax, Delhi - IIII reported in 2018 (8) GSTL 32 (Del.) was countered by ld. AR stating that the facts of the said case are entirely different and is not applicable to the present case.
1