Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 27 (1.03 seconds)The Urban Land (Ceiling And Regulation) Act, 1976
Section 16 in The Land Acquisition Act, 1894 [Entire Act]
Section 21 in The Companies Act, 1956 [Entire Act]
Article 226 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Sri.S.M.Kannaiah vs The State Of Karnataka on 14 February, 2011
9. The full Bench of this Court in the case of
S.M. Kannaiah v. State of Karnataka, [2011 SCC
OnLine Kar 49] at para 12 has held as follows:
Sulochana Chandrakant Galande vs Pune Municipal Transport & Ors on 3 August, 2010
10. The Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of
Sulochana Chandrakant Galande v. Pune Municipal
Transport, [(2010) 8 SCC 467] has held as follows:
Fruit And Vegetable Merchants Union vs Delhi Improvement Trust on 6 November, 1956
In Fruit &
Vegetable Merchants Union v. Delhi Improvement
Trust [AIR 1957 SC 344] this Court held that the meaning
of the word "vesting" varies as per the context of the
statute in which the property vests. While considering the
case under Sections 16 and 17 of the 1894 Act, the Court
held as under : (AIR p. 353, para 19)
"19. ... the property acquired becomes the property
of Government without any conditions or limitations either
as to title or possession. The legislature has made it clear
that the vesting of the property is not for any limited
purpose or limited duration."
The Collector Of Bombay vs Nusserwanji Rattanji Mistri & Others on 28 February, 1955
14. "Encumbrance" actually means the burden
caused by an act or omission of man and not that created
by nature. It means a burden or charge upon property or
a claim or lien on the land. It means a legal liability on
property. Thus, it constitutes a burden on the title which
diminishes the value of the land. It may be a mortgage or
a deed of trust or a lien of an easement. An encumbrance,
thus, must be a charge on the property. It must run with
the property. (Vide Collector of Bombay v. Nusserwanji
Rattanji Mistri [AIR 1955 SC 298] , H.P. SEB v. Shiv K.
Sharma [(2005) 2 SCC 164 : AIR 2005 SC 954] and AI
Champdany Industries Ltd. v. Official Liquidator [(2009) 4
SCC 486] .)
Ai Champday Industries Ltd vs Official Liquidator & Anr on 19 February, 2009
14. "Encumbrance" actually means the burden
caused by an act or omission of man and not that created
by nature. It means a burden or charge upon property or
a claim or lien on the land. It means a legal liability on
property. Thus, it constitutes a burden on the title which
diminishes the value of the land. It may be a mortgage or
a deed of trust or a lien of an easement. An encumbrance,
thus, must be a charge on the property. It must run with
the property. (Vide Collector of Bombay v. Nusserwanji
Rattanji Mistri [AIR 1955 SC 298] , H.P. SEB v. Shiv K.
Sharma [(2005) 2 SCC 164 : AIR 2005 SC 954] and AI
Champdany Industries Ltd. v. Official Liquidator [(2009) 4
SCC 486] .)