Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 6 of 6 (0.26 seconds)Delhi Administration & Ors vs Kaushilya Thakur & Anr on 9 April, 2012
10. We may refer to Supreme Court's decision,
in case of "Delhi Administration & Ors. Vs. Kaushilya
Thakur & Anr., reported in (2012) 5 SCC 412, wherein it
has been held that High Court, under Article 226 of the
Constitution of India, cannot entertain belated claims in the
absence of any tangible explanation. Paragraphs 10, 11 and
Patna High Court LPA No.533 of 2015 dt.08-01-2016
9/10
14 of the said decision, being relevant, being extracted
hereinbelow:-
State Of Madhya Pradesh vs Bhailal Bhai & Ors on 20 January, 1964
11. It is trite to say that in
exercise of the power under Article 226
of the Constitution, the High Court
cannot entertain belated claims unless
the petitioner offers tangible
explanation (State of M.P. v. Bhailal
Bhai).
S.S. Balu And Anr vs State Of Kerala And Ors on 13 January, 2009
11. Reference, with regard to the above, may
also be made to the case of S.S. Balu and Another v. State
of Kerala and Another, reported in (2009) 2 SCC 479.
Parvati Kumari & Ors vs State Of Bihar & Ors on 25 July, 2013
4. Today, in a batch of three appeals, preferred
by the State of Bihar, i.e., L.P.A. Nos.430 of 2014, 474 of
2014 and 312 of 2014 (The State Government of Bihar & Anr.
vs. Parvati Kumari & Ors.), we have set aside the common
judgment and order, dated 25.07.2013, passed by a learned
Patna High Court LPA No.533 of 2015 dt.08-01-2016
4/10
single Judge of this Court, whereby, while disposing of three
writ applications, filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of
India, viz., C.W.J.C. Nos.13136 of 2001, 10437 of 2002 and
7237 of 1999 (Parvati Kumari & Ors. vs. The State of Bihar &
Ors.), preferred by the Principal and Teachers of the said
College, the said order, dated 09.11.2001, was set aside.
The State Of Bihar Governent Through The ... vs Parvati Kumari & Ors on 11 November, 2014
4. Today, in a batch of three appeals, preferred
by the State of Bihar, i.e., L.P.A. Nos.430 of 2014, 474 of
2014 and 312 of 2014 (The State Government of Bihar & Anr.
vs. Parvati Kumari & Ors.), we have set aside the common
judgment and order, dated 25.07.2013, passed by a learned
Patna High Court LPA No.533 of 2015 dt.08-01-2016
4/10
single Judge of this Court, whereby, while disposing of three
writ applications, filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of
India, viz., C.W.J.C. Nos.13136 of 2001, 10437 of 2002 and
7237 of 1999 (Parvati Kumari & Ors. vs. The State of Bihar &
Ors.), preferred by the Principal and Teachers of the said
College, the said order, dated 09.11.2001, was set aside.
1