Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 7 of 7 (0.21 seconds)
Ajit Kaur vs The Punjab State Federation Of ... on 19 December, 2018 cites

Atul Maheshwari & 3 Ors., vs Yamuna Expressway Industrial ... on 2 November, 2015

So far as the point of enhanced cost of the allotted flat is concerned, this is a pricing factor, which is beyond the competence of Consumer Commission to decide. The Consumer Commission cannot look into the pricing factor involved between the allottee and allotter in such matter. It is for the Civil Court to determine these types of matters pertaining to pricing factor only. The counsel for complainant relied upon laws laid down in "Atul Maheshwari & others Vs. Yamuna Expressway Industrial Development Authority" 2016(2)CPJ-623, "Huda Vs. Parveen Kumar Jain" 2017(2)CLT-231, "Punjab Urban Planning and Development Authority Vs. Darshana Devi" 2017(3)CPJ-134, Consumer Complaint No.1014 of 2017 14 "Kumaon Mandal Vikas Nigam Ltd. Vs. Pooran Lal" 2015(2)CPR- 601, "Sangeeta Jain and others Vs. Yamuna Expressway Industrial Development Authority & others" 2016(1)CPR-599 by the National Commission. In all the above referred authorities, the Hon'ble National Commission held that where possession has not been delivered within agreed period, it is deficiency in service justifying the refund of the deposited amount.
National Consumer Disputes Redressal Cites 1 - Cited by 1 - Full Document

Sangeeta Jain & 2 Ors. vs Yamuna Expressway Industrial ... on 21 January, 2016

So far as the point of enhanced cost of the allotted flat is concerned, this is a pricing factor, which is beyond the competence of Consumer Commission to decide. The Consumer Commission cannot look into the pricing factor involved between the allottee and allotter in such matter. It is for the Civil Court to determine these types of matters pertaining to pricing factor only. The counsel for complainant relied upon laws laid down in "Atul Maheshwari & others Vs. Yamuna Expressway Industrial Development Authority" 2016(2)CPJ-623, "Huda Vs. Parveen Kumar Jain" 2017(2)CLT-231, "Punjab Urban Planning and Development Authority Vs. Darshana Devi" 2017(3)CPJ-134, Consumer Complaint No.1014 of 2017 14 "Kumaon Mandal Vikas Nigam Ltd. Vs. Pooran Lal" 2015(2)CPR- 601, "Sangeeta Jain and others Vs. Yamuna Expressway Industrial Development Authority & others" 2016(1)CPR-599 by the National Commission. In all the above referred authorities, the Hon'ble National Commission held that where possession has not been delivered within agreed period, it is deficiency in service justifying the refund of the deposited amount.
National Consumer Disputes Redressal Cites 1 - Cited by 1 - Full Document

Kumaon Mandal Vikas Nigam Ltd. vs Pooran Lal on 6 April, 2015

So far as the point of enhanced cost of the allotted flat is concerned, this is a pricing factor, which is beyond the competence of Consumer Commission to decide. The Consumer Commission cannot look into the pricing factor involved between the allottee and allotter in such matter. It is for the Civil Court to determine these types of matters pertaining to pricing factor only. The counsel for complainant relied upon laws laid down in "Atul Maheshwari & others Vs. Yamuna Expressway Industrial Development Authority" 2016(2)CPJ-623, "Huda Vs. Parveen Kumar Jain" 2017(2)CLT-231, "Punjab Urban Planning and Development Authority Vs. Darshana Devi" 2017(3)CPJ-134, Consumer Complaint No.1014 of 2017 14 "Kumaon Mandal Vikas Nigam Ltd. Vs. Pooran Lal" 2015(2)CPR- 601, "Sangeeta Jain and others Vs. Yamuna Expressway Industrial Development Authority & others" 2016(1)CPR-599 by the National Commission. In all the above referred authorities, the Hon'ble National Commission held that where possession has not been delivered within agreed period, it is deficiency in service justifying the refund of the deposited amount.
National Consumer Disputes Redressal Cites 3 - Cited by 1 - Full Document

Punjab Urban Planning And Development ... vs Darshana Devi on 1 May, 2017

So far as the point of enhanced cost of the allotted flat is concerned, this is a pricing factor, which is beyond the competence of Consumer Commission to decide. The Consumer Commission cannot look into the pricing factor involved between the allottee and allotter in such matter. It is for the Civil Court to determine these types of matters pertaining to pricing factor only. The counsel for complainant relied upon laws laid down in "Atul Maheshwari & others Vs. Yamuna Expressway Industrial Development Authority" 2016(2)CPJ-623, "Huda Vs. Parveen Kumar Jain" 2017(2)CLT-231, "Punjab Urban Planning and Development Authority Vs. Darshana Devi" 2017(3)CPJ-134, Consumer Complaint No.1014 of 2017 14 "Kumaon Mandal Vikas Nigam Ltd. Vs. Pooran Lal" 2015(2)CPR- 601, "Sangeeta Jain and others Vs. Yamuna Expressway Industrial Development Authority & others" 2016(1)CPR-599 by the National Commission. In all the above referred authorities, the Hon'ble National Commission held that where possession has not been delivered within agreed period, it is deficiency in service justifying the refund of the deposited amount.
Supreme Court - Daily Orders Cites 0 - Cited by 2 - Full Document
1