Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 7 of 7 (0.50 seconds)
The Executive Engineer vs B. H. Nagarajareddy @ Nagarajareddy on 8 October, 2025 cites

Karnataka Power Transmission ... vs A P Manoharachar on 7 August, 2014

The trial Court while determining the compensation has taken the guidelines that are enumerated in the case of Karnataka Power Transmission Corporation Ltd., Bengaluru and Others vs A.P Manoharachar5 and applying the said guidelines the compensation has been quantified at ` 1,49,212/-. This Court further finds that the decisions relied upon by the petitioners are distinguishable on facts. In the present case, Deputy Commissioner's order reveals that only crop loss and surface damage were assessed, and there was no separate evaluation of the diminution in value of the land. Consequently, the contention of the petitioners that the earlier writ petitions were decided in their favour and the compensation towards diminution value awarded by Courts had been set aside, cannot aid the petitioners, as decisions are per incuriam and not applicable to the facts of the present case. This Court finds no error in the reasoning of 5 2015 (1) KCCR 245 -9- NC: 2025:KHC:39729 WP No. 1470 of 2025 HC-KAR the trial Court. The finding that diminution in land value was not included in Deputy Commissioner's determination is borne out by the record. The award of additional compensation is justified and does not warrant any interference and this Court pass the following :
Karnataka High Court Cites 12 - Cited by 1 - P B Sanganagouda - Full Document

Smt. Jayamma vs The Executive Engineer (Ele.) on 23 September, 2022

4. In support of their respective contentions, both sides relied on various coordinate Bench decisions. The learned counsel for the petitioners has relied upon the decision of the co-ordinate Bench of this Court in Executive -4- NC: 2025:KHC:39729 WP No. 1470 of 2025 HC-KAR Engineer and Another vs Katappa1, Similarly, in the cases of Executive Engineer and Another vs H.M Shivanandaiah2, and Executive Engineer and Another vs Jayamma3, (all disposed of on 09.09.2022), to contend that under identical circumstances, when the Deputy Commissioner had already taken diminution value of the land into account, the trial Court could not award additional compensation.
Karnataka High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - J Mulimani - Full Document

The Executive Engineer vs Sri H M Shivanandaiah on 9 September, 2022

4. In support of their respective contentions, both sides relied on various coordinate Bench decisions. The learned counsel for the petitioners has relied upon the decision of the co-ordinate Bench of this Court in Executive -4- NC: 2025:KHC:39729 WP No. 1470 of 2025 HC-KAR Engineer and Another vs Katappa1, Similarly, in the cases of Executive Engineer and Another vs H.M Shivanandaiah2, and Executive Engineer and Another vs Jayamma3, (all disposed of on 09.09.2022), to contend that under identical circumstances, when the Deputy Commissioner had already taken diminution value of the land into account, the trial Court could not award additional compensation.
Karnataka High Court Cites 3 - Cited by 0 - J Mulimani - Full Document
1