Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 45 (0.44 seconds)
Prabhu vs The State Of Karnataka on 16 December, 2025 cites

Chhedi Lal Yadav vs Hari Kishore Yadav (D) Thr. Lrs. & Ors. on 19 April, 2017

34. The Hon'ble Supreme Court in para 8 of the judgment in Nekkanti Rama Lakshmi´s case referred to supra relying on its earlier judgment in Chhedi Lal Yadav v. Hari Kishore Yadav (D) LRS14 held that an action, whether on an application of the parties or suo-moto must be taken within the period prescribed by law, if no such period is prescribed under any law, that must be taken within a reasonable time. It was further held that, if an application is made after unreasonably long time, such application is liable to be dismissed.
Supreme Court - Daily Orders Cites 7 - Cited by 77 - Full Document

A.Subash Babu vs State Of A.P.& Anr on 21 July, 2011

113. In view of withdrawal of the earlier appeal the finding of the DCVC that is the original order, under Section 4C becomes final and binding. This is on the broad principle of law that a finality of a decision after appeal having been withdrawn prevents re-litigation on the same issue by others who share the same interest. The judgment relied on by the learned Special counsel in the case of Subash Babu supra, is factually differ and not applicable, as in the said case fraud was alleged and in the case on hand the same is lacking due lack of pleadings and particulars to that effect within Order VI Rule 4 of C.P.C and the same is considered earlier, as there is no particulars of fraud, undue influence or misrepresentation.
Supreme Court of India Cites 37 - Cited by 129 - J M Panchal - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 Next