Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 4 of 4 (0.28 seconds)
Teachers Recruitment Board vs R. Dyson on 10 April, 2023 cites

Parshavanath Charitable Trust & Ors vs All India Council For Tech.Edu& Ors on 13 December, 2012

In view of the above, it is clear that the State Government cannot lay down any guidelines or policies in conflict with the Central Statute or the standards laid down by the Central body, like AICTE, therefore, the qualifications fixed by the AICTE are binding on the State Government, hence, the State Government cannot insist on equivalent Government Order, especially when no such order is available.
Supreme Court of India Cites 20 - Cited by 307 - S Kumar - Full Document

Prakash Chand Meena And Ors vs State (Panchayati Raj Dep )Ors on 4 March, 2013

11.In the case at hand, the first respondent obtained B.E. degree in ECE and M.E. degree in Instrumentation Engineering and hence, his candidature for appointment to the post of Assistant Professor in ECE, was rejected by the appellant, for the reason that 'PG is not related to ECE'. Stating that as per the AICTE regulations, a person with B.E. (ECE) and M.E. (Instrumentation Engineering) qualifications, is eligible for the faculty of ECE, and the said regulations are binding on the appellant, the first respondent approached the writ court. The learned Judge allowed the writ petition by setting aside the order of the appellant, on the premise that the State Government cannot lay down any guidelines or policies in conflict with the central statute or the standards laid down by the Central body, like AICTE; the qualifications fixed by the AICTE are binding on the State Government; and hence, the State https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 10/17 WA No. 2750 of 2021 Government cannot insist on equivalent Government order. Aggrieved by the same, the appellant is before this court.
Rajasthan High Court - Jaipur Cites 0 - Cited by 21 - M N Bhandari - Full Document
1