Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 14 (0.31 seconds)
Anil Kumar Rathod vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 27 January, 2018 cites

Drugdeal Corporation vs Smith on 26 October, 1967

WP No.2788/15, WP-9716-16 & OTHERS 8 'When a single section of an Act of Parliament is introduced into another Act, I think it must be read in the sense which it bore in the original Act from which it was taken, and that consequently it is perfectly legitimate to refer to all the rest of that Act in order to ascertain what the section meant, though those other sections are not incorporated in the new Act.'Portsmouth Corpn. v. Smith, (1885) 10 AC 364 (HL) at p. 371."
Delhi High Court Cites 6 - Cited by 10 - Full Document

Ram Kirpal Bhagat & Ors vs State Of Bihar on 13 November, 1969

In Ram Kirpal Bhagat v. State of Bihar (1969) 3 SCC 471 this Court examined the effect of bringing into an Act the provisions of an earlier Act and held that the legislation by incorporation of the provisions of an earlier Act into a subsequent Act is that the provisions so incorporated are treated to have been incorporated in the subsequent legislation for the first time. This Court observed: (SCC p. 478, para 18) "18. ... The effect of bringing into an Act the provisions of an earlier Act is to introduce the incorporated sections of the earlier Act into the subsequent Act as if those provisions have been enacted in it for the first time. The nature of such a piece of legislation was explained by Lord Esher, M.R. in Wood's Estate, In re that: (Ch D p. 615) 'if some clauses of a former Act were brought into the subsequent Act the legal effect was to write those sections into the new Act just as if they had been written in it with the pen'."
Supreme Court of India Cites 36 - Cited by 45 - A N Ray - Full Document

Mahindra & Mahindra Ltd vs Union Of India & Anr on 24 January, 1979

19. To the same effect is the decision of this Court in Mahindra and Mahindra Ltd. v. Union of India, (1979) 2 SCC 529 wherein this Court held that once the incorporation is made, the provisions incorporated become an integral part of the statute in which it is transposed and thereafter there is no need to refer to the statute from which the incorporation is made and any subsequent amendment made in it has no effect on the incorporating statute. The following passage is in this regard apposite: (SCC p. 548, para 8) "8. ... The effect of incorporation is as if the provision incorporated were written out in the incorporating statute and were a part of it. Legislation by incorporation is a common legislative device employed by the legislature, where the legislature for convenience of drafting incorporates provisions from an existing statute by WP No.2788/15, WP-9716-16 & OTHERS 9 reference to that statute instead of setting out for itself at length the provisions which it desires to adopt. Once the incorporation is made, the provision incorporated becomes an integral part of the statute in which it is transposed and thereafter there is no need to refer to the statute from which the incorporation is made and any subsequent amendment made in it has no effect on the incorporating statute."
Supreme Court of India Cites 49 - Cited by 292 - P N Bhagwati - Full Document
1   2 Next