Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 7 of 7 (0.20 seconds)
Ashok Kumar vs Staff Selection Commission on 22 November, 2013 cites

Yogender Pal Singh & Others vs Union Of India & Ors on 23 January, 1987

19. The case of Yogender Singh (supra), pertains to termination during probation on the allegation that he had indulged in malpractice during the recruitment/selection process, and hence, not applicable to the facts of the present case. The only similarity is that the SCN for termination was issued without any details of alleged malpractice, was quashed on the ground of violation of principles of natural justice.
Supreme Court of India Cites 19 - Cited by 89 - E S Venkataramiah - Full Document

Rakesh Kumar Yadav vs Staff Selection Commission on 9 May, 2013

17. In Dheeraj Singhs case (supra), the respondent-SSC by issuing a Show Cause Notice dated 09.04.2012, cancelled his candidature for CGLE-2011 on the ground that he was in possession of a mobile phone in the examination hall and further asked him to show cause as to why he should not be debarred from Commissions exam for a period of five years. Without taking any decision on the reply submitted by him, again issued another Show Cause Notice dated 28.05.2012, stating that there is prima facie evidence to believe that he might have resorted to unfair means in the examination and, therefore, his candidature is cancelled and asked to show cause as to why he should not be debarred from the Commissions exam for a period of five years. On questioning both the SCNs by filing the OA, a Coordinate Bench of this Tribunal after considering various decisions including Yogender Singh, Varun Bhardwaj, Sahadev Hooda and Rakesh Kumar (supra) quashed the SCNs on the ground that they being violative of principles of natural justice. However, giving liberty to the Commission to give a proper SCN specifying therein the means used by the applicant in the examination, considered by the Commission as unfair means and pass a fresh order after receiving his response thereto.
Central Administrative Tribunal - Delhi Cites 0 - Cited by 1 - Full Document

Varun Bhardwaj vs State Bank Of India & Ors. on 6 February, 2013

In Varun Bhardwaj (supra) he was one of the candidates for selection to the post of a Clerk in State Bank of India and for which he appeared for the examination held on 15.11.2009 which is an objective type test consisting of four Sections. The respondent No.1-SBI on the basis of a report given by the Institute of Banking Personnel Selection (IBPS) has denied appointment to the petitioner suspecting that unfair means were used by the petitioner inasmuch as wrong answers which are given by the petitioner tally with the wrong answers given by two other candidates, namely, Ms. Pooja and Ms. Rinku. It was admitted on behalf of Respondent No.1 that the petitioner was not directly caught in using the unfair means, however, the scientific consideration which is used by IBPS is applied by all Banks to ensure that whoever have indulged in malpractices should not be appointed in a Bank which deals with public moneys. For the better understanding the relevant paragraphs of the said Judgment are extracted as below:
Delhi High Court Cites 1 - Cited by 4 - V J Mehta - Full Document

Manish Dabas Etc. Etc. vs University Of Delhi & Anr. on 4 July, 2008

21. The Honble High Court of Delhi in Manish Dabas v. University of Delhi & Others, LPA No.39/2007 and batch decided on 04.07.2008, wherein also without there being any direct evidence of malpractice/copying, but by adopting a similar method wherein the candidates have no role, the respondent University debarred the petitioners, upheld the action of the University.
Delhi High Court Cites 9 - Cited by 3 - A K Sikri - Full Document
1