Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 6 of 6 (0.19 seconds)Union Of India vs Prabhakaran Vijaya Kumar & Ors on 5 May, 2008
the community of passengers and a liberal view
ought to be taken in favour of the claimant. It is
contended that a traveller with an ordinary ticket
in an Express train is nevertheless a passenger
defined by the Act and cannot be excluded from the
definition of 'passenger' in the Explanation to
proviso in Section 124-A of the Act. To support the
plea that the appellant was a bona fide passenger
entitled to compensation irrespective of the class
of ticket taken for the journey, the learned
counsel for the appellant relied on the following
decisions reported in Union of India v. Prabhakaran
Vijaya Kumar [2008(2) KLT 700 (SC)], Union of India
v. Rina Devi [2018(2) KLT 1060(SC)], Jayan v. Union
of India (2013(3) KLT 501), Union of India v.
A.Geetha & ors. (2017(3) KHC 303), Raju K.Thomas &
anr. v. Union of India (2017(4) KHC 59), Union of
India v. Leelamma & ors. (2009 KHC 256),
M.F.A.(RCT) NO.46 of 2012
:-7-:
Union Of India vs Leelamma Zacharia on 11 January, 2008
the community of passengers and a liberal view
ought to be taken in favour of the claimant. It is
contended that a traveller with an ordinary ticket
in an Express train is nevertheless a passenger
defined by the Act and cannot be excluded from the
definition of 'passenger' in the Explanation to
proviso in Section 124-A of the Act. To support the
plea that the appellant was a bona fide passenger
entitled to compensation irrespective of the class
of ticket taken for the journey, the learned
counsel for the appellant relied on the following
decisions reported in Union of India v. Prabhakaran
Vijaya Kumar [2008(2) KLT 700 (SC)], Union of India
v. Rina Devi [2018(2) KLT 1060(SC)], Jayan v. Union
of India (2013(3) KLT 501), Union of India v.
A.Geetha & ors. (2017(3) KHC 303), Raju K.Thomas &
anr. v. Union of India (2017(4) KHC 59), Union of
India v. Leelamma & ors. (2009 KHC 256),
M.F.A.(RCT) NO.46 of 2012
:-7-:
Union Of India, Thr. The General ... vs Smt. Nandabai Sheshrao Dangat on 6 August, 2015
In this respect, he relied on two
decisions in Union of India v. Nandabai [2016(1)
KLT Online 2241 (Bom.Nagpur)] and S.K.Sharma v. The
General Manager, Railway(ILR (2007) MP 397).
Section 16 in The Railway Claims Tribunal Act, 1987 [Entire Act]
Union Of India vs Deena.T on 22 August, 2012
706) and Union of India v. Deena (2012(4) KLT 5).
1