Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 8 of 8 (0.21 seconds)

Chhattisgarh State Power Distribution ... vs Ramasis Singh 12 Mcrc/7/2019 Kamar Sai ... on 7 January, 2019

PW6 HC Lokender Kumar: The witness deposed that on 26.01.2015, he was marked with further investigation FIR No. 64/15 State v. Dharmender @ Dharmu 4 of 13 PS Anand Parbat of the case in the present FIR. Further, Const. Mehtab handed the copy of the FIR and original tehreer to him. Thereafter, he alongwith Const. Mehtab went to the spot and met SI Vidyakar Pathak. Thereafter, SI Vidyakar handed over the relevant documents and the accused to his possession. He also found Const. Anand Kumar from Excise Department at the spot and recorded his statement. He arrested the accused and conducted his personal search vide memos Ex.PW6/A and Ex.PW6/B. PW7: Const. Mehtab Singh: The witness deposed that on 26.01.2015 he was on patrolling duty with SI Vidykar Pathak. They received secret information in Taliwali Basti and apprehended the accused upon the basis of the secret information alongwith the illicit liquor. He was also sent to the police station by the IO and he brought the government seal. All the case properties were seized in his presence by SI Vidyakar Pathak with the seal of "ARPVT-V" vide seizure Ex.PW3/A. Thereafter, SI Vidyakar filled form No. M-29 in his presence. Then, IO prepared tehreer and he took the same to the police station and got the FIR registered and came back at the spot with HC Lokender. Accused was arrested in his presence and the case property was deposited in malkhana.
Chattisgarh High Court Cites 1 - Cited by 45 - Full Document

Massa Singh And Another vs Financial Commissioner (Appeals-1) ... on 3 December, 2008

In the case of "Massa Singh Vs. State of Punjab" 2000(2) C.C. Cases HC 11, conviction was set aside on the ground that it was obligatory on the part of investigating officer to take assistance of independent witnesses to lend authenticity to the investigation conducted by him. It was observed as under : "The recovery has been effected from a public place. The investigating Officer could have taken the trouble to associate an independent witness to get the attestation of such independent witness regarding the authenticity of the investigation conducted by him. This aspect of the case has not been properly appreciated by the Court below."
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 4 - Cited by 462 - Full Document
1