Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 10 (0.31 seconds)Section 210 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Section 138 in The Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 [Entire Act]
The Indian Penal Code, 1860
The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973
The Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881
Section 420 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Zee News Ltd. vs State & Anr. on 25 April, 2016
Therefore, as per the mandate of superior courts
above said four conditions must be satisfied in case the
application u/s 210 CrPC is to be allowed and in Zee News case
application u/s 210 CrPC was dismissed as the condition as laid
down in citation 210 (2) CrPC was not satisfied with liberty to the
petitioner (therein) to invoke the said provision at appropriate
stage.
U.P. S.R.T.C. And Ors. vs Har Narain Singh And Ors. on 14 August, 1997
In Har Narain (supra) it was
observed that as long as the fact under investigation by the police
include the fact mentioned in the complaint case, then it will
make no difference if the police come to the conclusion that
offence not mentioned in the complaint have been committed by
12/15
CR No.23/2017
S. K. Kaushik Vs. State & Ors.
Mukesh Kumar Patel vs State Of Chhattisgarh 107 ... on 28 November, 2017
(iii) complaint title S. K. Kaushik Vs. Parma Ram in which FIR
bearing no.0249/17, u/s 420/468/471/406/448/120B/34 IPC has
been lodged against Parmaram, Vikas Singh and Santosh Devi is
the same.Therefore, by invoking the provision of section 210 CrPC
all these cases be tried together and till the investigation by the
police is pending, the proceeding of the trial u/s 138 N.I. Act be
stayed,. It has been further submitted that ld trial court has
wrongly dismissed the application through impugned order
without appreciating the legal preposition laid down by superior
courts so far as interpretation of section 210 CrPC is concerned.
1