Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 9 of 9 (0.28 seconds)Section 67 in Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964 [Entire Act]
Karnataka Town and Country Planning Act, 1961
Section 288 in Karnataka Municipal Corporations Act, 1976 [Entire Act]
Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964
Chhedi Lal Yadav(D) Thr. Lr. And Ors. vs Hari Kishore Yadav (D) Thr. Lrs. And Ors. on 12 September, 2017
MFA Nos.8632/2022 C/W 8426/2022,
8427/2022 & 8428/2022
Chhedi Lal & Ors. v. Hari Kishore Yadav reported in
(2018) 12 SCC 527, it was submitted, failure to take action
within reasonable time was held to justify grant of injunction.
Anathula Sudhakar vs P. Buchi Reddy (Dead) By Lrs & Ors on 25 March, 2008
19. Further, reference was also made to decision in
Anathula Sudhakar v. P.Buchi Reddy, reported in AIR
2008 SC 2033, about principles for grant of injunction. It was
submitted, trial Court had rightly applied said principles while
granting injunction and contended that trial Court was justified
in allowing application and sought dismissal of appeal.
Mohd Mehtab Khan & Ors vs Khushnuma Ibrahim Khan & Ors on 24 January, 2013
25. This is an appeal against discretionary order passed
by trial Court under Order XXXIX Rules 1 and 2 of CPC on
I.A.no.1. As per decision in Mohd. Mehtab Ibrahim Khan v.
Khushnuma Ibrahim Khan, reported in 2013 (9) SCC 221,
scope for interference in appeal against discretionary order
would be limited, unless it were untenable or suffered from
perversity etc. It is also clarified therein that in case view taken
by trial Court on available material were to be one of possible
views, there could be no interference.
Section 210 in THE BRUHAT BENGALURU MAHANAGARA PALIKE ACT, 2020 [Entire Act]
1