Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 3 of 3 (0.16 seconds)
Krishan Alias Chanda @ Chandi Ram vs Deepak And Ors on 13 November, 2019 cites

Paramjit Singh And Another vs Dilbagh Singh Alias Bagga And Others on 16 May, 2013

The claim has been filed by the husband and son of the deceased. A house maker has multifarious duties to perform and is available to the family round the clock. Taking a clue from notification issued by the 5 of 6 ::: Downloaded on - 13-01-2020 01:54:44 ::: FAO-8463-2015 and other connected cases -6- State of Haryana and obligations discharged by a house-maker, income of the deceased is assessed at Rs.7500/- per month. No deduction for personal expenses would be made in the light of Division Bench judgment of this Court Paramjit Singh and another Vs. Dilbagh Singh @ Bagga and others, 2013(3) Law Herald 2730. Multiplier applied by the Tribunal is correct and affirmed. In this manner, loss of dependency is calculated at Rs.12,60,000/- (7500 x 12 x 14).
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 6 - Cited by 139 - R K Jain - Full Document

Karnail Singh Wife Of Jarnail Singh And ... vs Balwinder Singh Son Of Anant Singh And ... on 17 January, 2013

In this context, reference can be made to judgments of this Court Banwari Lal and another Vs. Ran Singh and others, FAO No.2191 of 2014, decided on 23.08.2016 and Karnail Singh and others vs. Balwinder Singh and another 2013(1) Vol. 169 PLR 774. In the given circumstances, findings of the Tribunal attributing contributory negligence to riders of the motorcycle cannot be allowed to sustain and are accordingly set aside. As a natural corollary, the claimants would be entitle to receive the entire compensation assessed by the Tribunal and additional compensation, if any, allowed by this Court.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 1 - Cited by 6 - K Kannan - Full Document

Banwari Lal & Another vs Ran Singh & Others on 20 September, 2012

In this context, reference can be made to judgments of this Court Banwari Lal and another Vs. Ran Singh and others, FAO No.2191 of 2014, decided on 23.08.2016 and Karnail Singh and others vs. Balwinder Singh and another 2013(1) Vol. 169 PLR 774. In the given circumstances, findings of the Tribunal attributing contributory negligence to riders of the motorcycle cannot be allowed to sustain and are accordingly set aside. As a natural corollary, the claimants would be entitle to receive the entire compensation assessed by the Tribunal and additional compensation, if any, allowed by this Court.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 0 - Cited by 6 - L N Mittal - Full Document
1