Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 13 (0.23 seconds)Section 10 in The Bihar Consolidation of Holdings and Prevention of Fragmentation Act, 1956 [Entire Act]
Section 9A in The Bihar Consolidation of Holdings and Prevention of Fragmentation Act, 1956 [Entire Act]
Section 10A in The Bihar Consolidation of Holdings and Prevention of Fragmentation Act, 1956 [Entire Act]
Section 9 in The Bihar Consolidation of Holdings and Prevention of Fragmentation Act, 1956 [Entire Act]
Section 32 in The Bihar Consolidation of Holdings and Prevention of Fragmentation Act, 1956 [Entire Act]
Section 34 in The Bihar Consolidation of Holdings and Prevention of Fragmentation Act, 1956 [Entire Act]
Thakur Jagannath Baksh Singh vs Secretary Of State on 1 May, 1946
3. Mr. Vindhya Keshari Kumar learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that neither the appellate authority nor the revisional authority could pass such an order in respect of plot No. 238 in absence of any objection filed by Mossomat Sakuni under Section 10 (3) of the Act. He relied upon a Bench decision of this Court in Jagarnath Thakur v. State of Bihar and Ors. (1984) B. B. C. J. 140. in which it was held that if no objection was taken under Section 10 of the Act then no objection could be taken subsequently. It was also submitted that the provisions of Section 35 of the Act cannot override the provisions contained in Section 10 of the Act and, therefore, in the facts and circumstances of this case even the revisional authority could not have passed by the impugned order under Section 35 of the Act.