Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 5 of 5 (0.25 seconds)
A.Balakrishnan (Deceased) vs Secretary To Government on 28 April, 2023 cites

Mr.R.Jayakumar Jayaraj vs The Deputy Inspector General Of Police on 31 May, 2017

In one such decision of a learned Single Judge of this Court of this Court in R.Jayakumar Vs. The Deputy Commissioner of Police and another in W.P.No.26072 of 2004, dated 08.08.2008, the High Court had placed reliance on three decisions of the Hon'ble Supreme Court and interfered with the punishment of dismissal for the period of unauthorised absence of 21 days and directed the delinquent therein to be reinstated into services without benefit of pay for the period of absence.
Madras High Court Cites 31 - Cited by 23 - R Mahadevan - Full Document

G.Srinivasan vs The Superintendent Of Police - ... on 31 August, 2015

17. Uniform consideration is the hall-mark of judicial discipline and justice dispensation and on such consideration this petitioner's claim can also be brought within the ambit of the decisions referred to above. In teh above circumstances, this Court is of the considered view that in order to secure that ends of justice, the impugned orders passed by the first respondent in P.R.No.64 of 2014 dated 20.02.2015 and confirmed by the second respondent in C.No.B1/AP16/002982/2015 dated 18.03.2015 and further confirmed by the 3rd respondent in RC.No.90985/AP2(2)/2015 dated 29.08.2016 are hereby set aside and the Disciplinary Authority i.e., the first respondent is directed to impose any other penalty on the petitioner other than 'compulsory retirement', 'removal from service' and 'dismissal', and on such imposition of penalty, the petitioner's period of non- employment may be regulated accordingly."
Madras High Court Cites 1 - Cited by 1 - P N Prakash - Full Document
1