Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 13 (0.74 seconds)The Income Tax Act, 1961
The Finance Act, 2018
Finance (No. 2) Act, 2014
State Of Madhya Pradesh And Anr vs G.S. Dall And Flour Mills on 19 September, 1990
(b) State of M.P. Vs. G.S.Dall Mills (1990)
187 ITR 478
Reliance Jute & Industries Ltd vs C.I.T., West Bengal, Calcutta on 10 October, 1979
3. We have considered the rival submissions of ld.
representatives of both sides and perused the material
available on record. Brief facts are that the assessee declared
4
nil income in its return after claiming deduction u/s 80IB(10) of
the Act amounting to Rs. 35,42,526/- (AY 04-05),
Rs.23,42,464/- (AY 05-06) and Rs.9,62,915 (AY 06-07). The
Assessing Officer was of the view that the claimed deduction is
only available in respect of eligible housing project, subject to
fulfilment of conditions laid down in the Section. The Assessing
Officer held that the deduction is not allowable to the assessee
especially when the assessee has not satisfied the conditions
laid down under the provisions of Section 80IB(10) of the Act.
On appeal, the ld. CIT(A) approved initiation of proceedings u/s
147 as the built-up area of two bungalows was more than 1500
sq. ft., consequently, he affirmed withdrawal of deduction u/s
80IB(10) of the Act, being inadmissible. The assessee is in
further appeal before this Tribunal.