Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 14 (0.25 seconds)

Commissioner Of Imcome Tax-Ltu vs M/S. Holcim (India) Pvt. Ltd on 6 July, 2022

"4.2.3 In consideration of the above facts it is seen that the interest paid by the appellant during the year is not relatable to investment and it is 17 ITA Nos. 6242/Del/2013 & ors. apparent that there is no nexus between the borrowed money on which interest was paid and the investments and the interest payments are squarely related to the business activities of the appellant company. Moreover, as mentioned above there is no exempt income. Beside the judgments relied upon by the appellant the facts of the case are also covered in favour of the appellant by the decision of the Hon'ble Delhi High Court in CIT v. Holcim India Pvt. Ltd. [2015] 57 taxmann.com 28 (Delhi) and Cheminvest Ltd-v- ACIT 378 ITR 33 Delhi wherein it has been held that where the interest free funds available with the assessee were more than investment made in tax free securities, no disallowance under section 14A could be made. The AO has incorrectly made further disallowance on this account in the computation as per Rule 8D of the Income Tax Rules. The addition is therefore deleted."
Bombay High Court Cites 0 - Cited by 12 - A Ahuja - Full Document
1   2 Next