Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 5 of 5 (0.18 seconds)
Union Of India vs Bhartendu Gaur on 20 October, 2022 cites

Union Of India And Ors vs R.K. Sharma on 9 October, 2001

10. Resultantly, by virtue of MACP Scheme, 2009, the respondents were definitely entitled to the benefit of 3 rd Financial Upgradation after completion of ten years' service on the post of MCM. The fervent contention of Shri Maheshwari for assailing the direction given by the Tribunal to this office was that the same is in conflict with the observations made by Hon'ble the Supreme (Downloaded on 21/10/2022 at 08:53:55 PM) (10 of 11) [CW-3840/2021] Court in the case of R.K. Sharma (supra). He urged that the Grade Pay of Rs.4,600/-, which has been granted by the Tribunal to the respondents, is the Grade Pay of the next promotional post.
Supreme Court of India Cites 16 - Cited by 170 - S N Variava - Full Document

Union Of India & Ors vs Girdhari Lal Saini & Anr on 10 May, 2018

9. It is admitted that the respondent employees were initially appointed as Diesel Engine Static (DES) (skilled). Though initially, they were given two promotions as HS (Highly Skilled) Grade II and then HS Grade I but later on, these two posts i.e. HS Grade II and HS Grade I were merged and redesignated as HS w.e.f. 01.01.1996. With the merger of the posts, one promotion would have to be ignored as has been held by Division Bench of this Court in the case of Union of India & Ors. vs. Girdhari Lal Saini & Anr. (supra) which view has been affirmed by Hon'ble the Supreme Court. The respondent employees were given placement in the Grade of MCM pursuant to restructuring of the cadre of Artisan Staff.
Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur Cites 0 - Cited by 3 - Full Document

Union Of India & Ors vs Mahendra Singh & Ors on 19 February, 2010

2. The Union of India, Ministry of Defence, has approached this Court through these writ petitions filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India for questioning legality of order dated 10.01.2020 [(D.B. Civil Writ Petition No.3840/2021 (Union of India & Ors. Vs. Bhartendu Gaur)], order dated 20.12.2019 [(D.B. Civil Writ Petition No.3857/2021 (Union of India & Ors. Vs. LRS of Sampat Lal Chhimpa)] and order dated 10.01.2020 [(D.B. Civil Writ Petition No.3847/2021 (Union of India & Ors. Vs. Bharat (Downloaded on 21/10/2022 at 08:53:55 PM) (3 of 11) [CW-3840/2021] Kumar & Ors.)], passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Bench Jodhpur, accepting the original applications filed by the respondents.
Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur Cites 3 - Cited by 18 - G K Vyas - Full Document

Union Of India vs Bhartendu Gaur on 7 March, 2022

2. The Union of India, Ministry of Defence, has approached this Court through these writ petitions filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India for questioning legality of order dated 10.01.2020 [(D.B. Civil Writ Petition No.3840/2021 (Union of India & Ors. Vs. Bhartendu Gaur)], order dated 20.12.2019 [(D.B. Civil Writ Petition No.3857/2021 (Union of India & Ors. Vs. LRS of Sampat Lal Chhimpa)] and order dated 10.01.2020 [(D.B. Civil Writ Petition No.3847/2021 (Union of India & Ors. Vs. Bharat (Downloaded on 21/10/2022 at 08:53:55 PM) (3 of 11) [CW-3840/2021] Kumar & Ors.)], passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Bench Jodhpur, accepting the original applications filed by the respondents.
Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur Cites 0 - Cited by 3 - Full Document
1