Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 17 (0.50 seconds)

Mukkattumbrath Ayisumma vs Vayyaprath Pazhae Bangalayil ... on 24 April, 1952

14. Basheer Ahmed Sayeed, J., in Ayisumma v. Mayomoot Umma (1952) a M.L.J. 933, was of the view that Sub-clause (b) of Section 16 of the Madras Civil Courts Act cannot be said to be consistent with Section 2 of the Shariat Act of 1937 and that, therefore, that sub-clause should be considered to be repealed by Section 6 of the Shariat Act. With deference to the learned Judge, we must say that the statement is a little too wide. A more accurate statement would be that sub-clause should be considered to be repealed in all matters set out in Section 2 of the Shariat Act. The same must be said of the statement of the learned Judge that in consequence of the Central Shariat Act as amended by the Madras Act.
Madras High Court Cites 23 - Cited by 5 - Full Document
1   2 Next